Kinsella v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 429 |
| Date | 09 April 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Legault v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 741
...capacity to work, rather than a medical diagnosis, that defines the severity of a disability (citing Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429 at para 33). In order to demonstrate an inability to pursue any regular and substantially gainful occupation, a claimant must also show that......
-
Mohammed v. Canada (Social Security Tribunal), 2022 FC 1124
...the Court cannot overturn the decision. Justice Kane summarized the issue best at paragraph 38 of Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429: The Court’s role, as described above, is very limited. Where there is no error by the Appeal Division, the Court cannot do more than co......
-
Dion v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1552
...suffered that is assessed, but rather, her ability to perform a substantially gainful occupation (Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429 at para 36). Here the evidence was that Ms. Dion had been employed at various times since 2014 and that she was able to perform the tasks......
3 cases
-
Legault v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 741
...capacity to work, rather than a medical diagnosis, that defines the severity of a disability (citing Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429 at para 33). In order to demonstrate an inability to pursue any regular and substantially gainful occupation, a claimant must also show that......
-
Mohammed v. Canada (Social Security Tribunal), 2022 FC 1124
...the Court cannot overturn the decision. Justice Kane summarized the issue best at paragraph 38 of Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429: The Court’s role, as described above, is very limited. Where there is no error by the Appeal Division, the Court cannot do more than co......
-
Dion v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1552
...suffered that is assessed, but rather, her ability to perform a substantially gainful occupation (Kinsella v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 429 at para 36). Here the evidence was that Ms. Dion had been employed at various times since 2014 and that she was able to perform the tasks......