Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice J.T. Eamon
Docket Number1901 11027
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date30 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Earth Drilling Co. Ltd. v Keystone Drilling Corp.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2023
    ...or other evidence of its legal costs to enable such scrutiny i.e. not simply assert a figure: see also Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 (Eamon J) at paras 27, 28, 34 and 51, particularly para Some case law, decided before the tariff was amended in March 2020[1], holds that c......
  • Ho v Lau,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2023
    ...or other evidence of its legal costs to enable such scrutiny i.e. not simply assert a figure: see also Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 (Eamon J) at paras 27, 28, 34 and 51, particularly para Some case law, decided before the tariff was amended in March 2020[1], holds that c......
  • Concrete Equities Inc. (Re),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 25, 2022
    ...the case law on costs in cases of mixed success. Justice Eamon of this Court made these comments in Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 at paras 5 and The Rules of Court provide that the successful party is entitled to costs following the event (R 10.29(1)), subject to the Court......
  • Rath & Company Barristers & Solicitors v Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...(County No 1) v Hildebrand, 2018 ABCA 406; Heather v Hatt, 2022 ABQB 496; Sharpe v Sharpe, 2014 ABQB 159; Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570. [25]           Those cases demonstrate more serious conduct than occurred in this instance......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Earth Drilling Co. Ltd. v Keystone Drilling Corp.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2023
    ...or other evidence of its legal costs to enable such scrutiny i.e. not simply assert a figure: see also Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 (Eamon J) at paras 27, 28, 34 and 51, particularly para Some case law, decided before the tariff was amended in March 2020[1], holds that c......
  • Ho v Lau,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2023
    ...or other evidence of its legal costs to enable such scrutiny i.e. not simply assert a figure: see also Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 (Eamon J) at paras 27, 28, 34 and 51, particularly para Some case law, decided before the tariff was amended in March 2020[1], holds that c......
  • Concrete Equities Inc. (Re),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 25, 2022
    ...the case law on costs in cases of mixed success. Justice Eamon of this Court made these comments in Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570 at paras 5 and The Rules of Court provide that the successful party is entitled to costs following the event (R 10.29(1)), subject to the Court......
  • Rath & Company Barristers & Solicitors v Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...(County No 1) v Hildebrand, 2018 ABCA 406; Heather v Hatt, 2022 ABQB 496; Sharpe v Sharpe, 2014 ABQB 159; Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 570. [25]           Those cases demonstrate more serious conduct than occurred in this instance......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT