KNAPP and ATHERTON v. ICR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE and OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | MITCHELL |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 59 |
| Date | 26 February 2019 |
| Docket Number | QBG 3370 of 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
Yeoman v. Universal Realty Ltd.
...of such issues requires a high degree of procedural fairness is also established. Both were noted in Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at paras 69 and 70, 58 Admin LR (6th) 205: [69] Yet, the informality of these proceedings cannot belie the significance of decisions rendered......
-
Haas v The Saskatchewan Veterinary Medical Association
...v Saskatchewan Joint Board, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, 2016 SKCA 94 at para 19, and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at paras [53] The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal expressly agreed with this analysis at paragraph 13 (see: Chenjelani v Institute of Chartere......
-
Leachman v. Singh
...scope of review is very limited. In this regard, I am assisted by Mitchell J.’s explanation in Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at [16] Section 72 of the Act provides an aggrieved party the right to appeal a hearing officer’s decision to this Cou......
-
Bell v. Mainstreet Equity Corp.
...tenants. See Green; Fiddler v Provost, 2022 SKKB 263; Bida v BLSBEM Holdings Ltd., 2019 SKQB 323; and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59, 58 Admin LR (6th) 205. Among other things, these cases note that, despite the summary and informal process of an RTA hearing, it is a form ......
Get Started for Free
15 cases
-
Yeoman v. Universal Realty Ltd.
...of such issues requires a high degree of procedural fairness is also established. Both were noted in Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at paras 69 and 70, 58 Admin LR (6th) 205: [69] Yet, the informality of these proceedings cannot belie the significance of decisions rendered......
-
Haas v The Saskatchewan Veterinary Medical Association
...v Saskatchewan Joint Board, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, 2016 SKCA 94 at para 19, and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at paras [53] The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal expressly agreed with this analysis at paragraph 13 (see: Chenjelani v Institute of Chartere......
-
Leachman v. Singh
...scope of review is very limited. In this regard, I am assisted by Mitchell J.’s explanation in Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at [16] Section 72 of the Act provides an aggrieved party the right to appeal a hearing officer’s decision to this Cou......
-
Bell v. Mainstreet Equity Corp.
...tenants. See Green; Fiddler v Provost, 2022 SKKB 263; Bida v BLSBEM Holdings Ltd., 2019 SKQB 323; and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59, 58 Admin LR (6th) 205. Among other things, these cases note that, despite the summary and informal process of an RTA hearing, it is a form ......
Get Started for Free
