Kocherkewych v. Greyhound, 2006 BCSC 534

JudgeEhrcke, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 21, 2006
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2006 BCSC 534;[2006] B.C.T.C. 534 (SC)

Kocherkewych v. Greyhound, [2006] B.C.T.C. 534 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.064

Anne M. Kocherkewych (plaintiff) v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., R&Z Warman Enterprises Ltd., Northland Properties Ltd. and John Doe (defendants) and R&Z Warman Enterprises Ltd., Ron Wohrmann, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., Northland Properties Ltd. and John Doe (third parties)

(S017194; 2006 BCSC 534)

Indexed As: Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Ehrcke, J.

April 4, 2006.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Contracts - Topic 2108

Terms - Express terms - Indemnity clauses - See paragraphs 10 to 62.

Insurance - Topic 17

General - Insured - Defined - See paragraphs 71 to 79.

Insurance - Topic 1851

The insurance contract - Interpretation of contract - General - See paragraphs 63 to 70.

Cases Noticed:

Canada Steamship Lines Ltd. v. R., [1952] 2 D.L.R. 786 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 34].

Alderslade v. Hendon Laundry Ltd., [1945] K.B. 189 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].

Grand Trunk Pacific Coast Steamship Co. v. Victoria-Vancouver Stevedoring Co. (1918), 57 S.C.R. 124, refd to. [para. 40].

Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. British Columbia Forest Products Ltd. (1965), 55 D.L.R.(2d) 229 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 40].

Griffiths v. New Westminster (City) et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 1482; 2001 BCSC 1482, refd to. [para. 42].

Roy v. Andrushko et al., [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. 273 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 42].

Sinclaire v. South Trail Shell (1987) et al., [2002] A.R. Uned. 539; 2002 ABQB 378, refd to. [para. 42].

Wallach v. Garside et al. (1993), 31 B.C.A.C. 166; 50 W.A.C. 166 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].

Cummer-Yonge Investments Ltd. v. Agnew-Surpass Shoe Stores Ltd., [1976] 2 S.C.R. 221; 4 N.R. 547, refd to. [para. 43].

Monenco Ltd. et al. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. et al., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 699; 274 N.R. 84; 155 B.C.A.C. 161; 254 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 45].

Ellett Industries Ltd. v. Laurentian P & C Insurance Co. (1996), 73 B.C.A.C. 72; 120 W.A.C. 72 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].

Pyrotech Products Ltd. et al. v. Ross Southward Tire Ltd. et al., [1976] 2 S.C.R. 35; 5 N.R. 541, refd to. [para. 45].

Smith et al. v. Eaton (T.) Co. et al., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 749; 15 N.R. 315, refd to. [para. 45].

Active Fire Protection 2000 Ltd. v. B.W.K. Construction Co. (2005), 200 O.A.C. 275 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].

Reid Crowther & Partners Ltd. v. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Co., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 252; 147 N.R. 44; 83 Man.R.(2d) 81; 36 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 64].

Counsel:

N.J. Tuytel, for the defendants and third parties, Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. and Northland Properties Ltd.;

W.A.C. Serné, for the defendants and third parties, R&Z Warman Enterprises Ltd. and Ron Wohrmann;

S.R. Lerner, for the third party, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada.

This application was heard on January 6 and 20 and February 21, 2006, before Ehrcke, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on April 4, 2006.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Galichowski v. Shaw GMC Pontiac Buick Hummer Ltd. et al., (2008) 459 A.R. 221 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 25, 2008
    ...ABQB 378, refd to. [para. 13]. Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. 534; 53 B.C.L.R.(4th) 360; 2006 BCSC 534, refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Fridman, Gerald Henry Louis, The Law of Contract in Canada (5th Ed. 2006), pp. 454 to 462 [para. ......
  • Manoaka Development Incorporated v. Allen Vissers, 2018 ONSC 5148
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 15, 2018
    ...Further, Down to Earth relies on the case of Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., 2006 BCSC 534, 35 C.C.L.I. (4th) 221, wherein the British Columbia Supreme Court held that the phrase "arising out of" imposes a causal requirement greater than a simple "but f......
  • Kinnear v. Recreation Excellence, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1899 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 25, 2010
    ...or occasioned by the negligence of [NORD or CRE]. [10] As Ehrcke J. said in Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al , 2006 BCSC 534: [34] The leading authority on the interpretation of indemnity clauses is the decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Ca......
3 cases
  • Galichowski v. Shaw GMC Pontiac Buick Hummer Ltd. et al., (2008) 459 A.R. 221 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 25, 2008
    ...ABQB 378, refd to. [para. 13]. Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. 534; 53 B.C.L.R.(4th) 360; 2006 BCSC 534, refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Fridman, Gerald Henry Louis, The Law of Contract in Canada (5th Ed. 2006), pp. 454 to 462 [para. ......
  • Manoaka Development Incorporated v. Allen Vissers, 2018 ONSC 5148
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 15, 2018
    ...Further, Down to Earth relies on the case of Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., 2006 BCSC 534, 35 C.C.L.I. (4th) 221, wherein the British Columbia Supreme Court held that the phrase "arising out of" imposes a causal requirement greater than a simple "but f......
  • Kinnear v. Recreation Excellence, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1899 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 25, 2010
    ...or occasioned by the negligence of [NORD or CRE]. [10] As Ehrcke J. said in Kocherkewych v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al , 2006 BCSC 534: [34] The leading authority on the interpretation of indemnity clauses is the decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Ca......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT