Kogler v. Schabernig et al., 2004 BCSC 522
Judge | Ralph, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | April 21, 2004 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | 2004 BCSC 522;[2004] B.C.T.C. 522 (SC) |
Kogler v. Schabernig, [2004] B.C.T.C. 522 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MY.028
Dietmar Kogler (plaintiff) v. Ann Schabernig and Rita Dick Executrix and Trustee of the Estate of Ewald Schabernig (defendants)
(S024282; 2004 BCSC 522)
Indexed As: Kogler v. Schabernig et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Ralph, J.
April 21, 2004.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Gifts - Topic 556
Gifts inter vivos - Presumption of gift - Advancement - Transfers between husband and wife - See paragraphs 41 to 72.
Gifts - Topic 565
Gifts inter vivos - Presumption of gift - Advancement - Rebuttal of presumption - See paragraph 69.
Gifts - Topic 724
Gifts inter vivos - Transfers in joint tenancy - Transfers to joint bank accounts - See paragraphs 41 to 72.
Restitution - Topic 123
Unjust enrichment - Remedies - Constructive trust - See paragraphs 70 to 72.
Trusts - Topic 1527
Secret trusts - Creation of secret trust - What constitutes a secret trust - See paragraph 76.
Trusts - Topic 2308
Constructive trusts - General principles - Circumstances when imposed - See paragraphs 70 to 72.
Trusts - Topic 2346
Constructive trusts - Basis for imposition - Unjust enrichment - See paragraphs 70 to 72.
Cases Noticed:
Mehta (K.P.) Estate v. Mehta (C.) Estate (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 54; 51 W.A.C. 54; 104 D.L.R.(4th) 24 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].
Aleksich v. Konradson, [1995] 6 W.W.R. 268; 56 B.C.A.C. 44; 92 W.A.C. 44 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].
Clarke v. Hambly, [2002] B.C.T.C. 1074; 46 E.T.R.(2d) 166; 2002 BCSC 1074, consd. [para. 44].
MacInnis Estate v. MacDonald (1994), 138 N.S.R.(2d) 321; 394 A.P.R. 321 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 44].
Dagle v. Dagle Estate et al. (1990), 81 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 245; 255 A.P.R. 245 (P.E.I.C.A.), consd. [para. 45].
Dacyshyn v. Dacyshyn, [1996] B.C.J. No. 626 (S.C.), consd. [para. 59].
Rathwell v. Rathwell, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 436; 19 N.R. 91; 83 D.L.R.(3d) 289; [1978] 2 W.W.R. 101; 1 E.T.R. 307; 1 R.F.L.(2d) 1, refd to. [para. 60].
Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257; 8 E.T.R. 143, refd to. [para. 70].
Soulos v. Korkontzilas et al., [1997] 2 S.C.R. 217; 212 N.R. 1; 100 O.A.C. 241; 146 D.L.R.(4th) 214, refd to. [para. 71].
Slater v. Klassen Estate, [2000] 3 W.W.R. 433; 143 Man.R.(2d) 284 (Q.B.), consd. [para. 73].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Waters, Donovan W.M., The Law of Trusts in Canada (2nd Ed. 1984), generally [para. 41].
Counsel:
Kenneth B. Friesen, for the plaintiff;
W.G. (Gil) Johnson and T.J. Johnston, for the defendant, Ann Schabernig;
Kathleen J. MacDonald, for the defendant, Rita Dick.
This case was heard on November 3-7 and 17-20, 2003, before Ralph, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on April 21, 2004.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McMillan v. Johnston Estate et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1929 (SC)
...between spouses is presumed to be an advancement and the burden is on the claimant to rebut the presumption: Kogler v. Schabernig , 2004 BCSC 522, 7 E.T.R. (3d) 31, at paragraphs 41 to 57. [40] Here, Helen has deposed that Billy's intention was that they both own the Kitsumkalum home jointl......
-
Kogler v. Schabernig Estate et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. Uned. 509
...cited as [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.058 . [1] Ralph, J. [in Chambers]: On April 21, 2004, I delivered reasons for judgment in this action (2004 BCSC 522). Central to the proceeding was the treatment of proceeds of approximately $2 million from the sale of two apartment buildings owned by the......
-
McMillan v. Johnston Estate et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1929 (SC)
...between spouses is presumed to be an advancement and the burden is on the claimant to rebut the presumption: Kogler v. Schabernig , 2004 BCSC 522, 7 E.T.R. (3d) 31, at paragraphs 41 to 57. [40] Here, Helen has deposed that Billy's intention was that they both own the Kitsumkalum home jointl......
-
Kogler v. Schabernig Estate et al., [2004] B.C.T.C. Uned. 509
...cited as [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.058 . [1] Ralph, J. [in Chambers]: On April 21, 2004, I delivered reasons for judgment in this action (2004 BCSC 522). Central to the proceeding was the treatment of proceeds of approximately $2 million from the sale of two apartment buildings owned by the......