Koivumaki v. Lusan, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1198

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeVoith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW,COURTS,PRACTICE
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1198,2014 BCSC 1198,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1198 (SC)
Date30 June 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Child Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...354 (BCSC). 694 See Stannard v Stannard, [1991] AJ No 679 (Alta QB); Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Koivumaki v Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para 10; BDD v GTS, 2021 BCSC Colter v Colter, 2015 NSSC 2; Lipson v Lipson (1972), 7 RFL 186 (Ont CA); Carvell v Carvell, [1969] 2 OR 51......
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...354 (BCSC). 653 See Stannard v Stannard, [1991] AJ No 679 (Alta QB); Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Koivumaki v Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para 10; Jaggs v Jaggs, 2018 BCSC Colter v Colter, 2015 NSSC 2; Lipson v Lipson (1972), 7 RFL 186 (Ont CA); Carvell v Carvell, [1969] 2 O......
  • Zhao v. Zhou, 2020 BCSC 516
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...additional financial information; and f) a change in the means or needs of the payor and payee spouse respectively. Koivumaki v. Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para. [26] Here I rely primarily on factors (b) and (e) to support my decision. [27] As to (b), I am concerned that the trial is now more......
  • Young v. Young, 2019 BCSC 1953
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 14, 2019
    ...number of more recent cases not cited by counsel (See for example:  Janmohamed v. Janmohamed, 2014 BCSC 107 and Koivumaki v. Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198). [34]        Thus, the test for establishing a change in circumstances for purposes of varying an inter......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Zhao v. Zhou, 2020 BCSC 516
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 3, 2020
    ...additional financial information; and f) a change in the means or needs of the payor and payee spouse respectively. Koivumaki v. Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para. [26] Here I rely primarily on factors (b) and (e) to support my decision. [27] As to (b), I am concerned that the trial is now more......
  • O.L.G. v. D.C.G., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 474
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 10, 2015
    ...in a number of more recent cases not cited by counsel (See for example: Janmohamed v. Janmohamed , 2014 BCSC 107 and Koivumaki v. Lusan , 2014 BCSC 1198). Discussion Has there been a compelling change of circumstances? [17] In my opinion, a number of circumstances have changed since Justice......
  • Young v. Young, 2019 BCSC 1953
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 14, 2019
    ...number of more recent cases not cited by counsel (See for example:  Janmohamed v. Janmohamed, 2014 BCSC 107 and Koivumaki v. Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198). [34]        Thus, the test for establishing a change in circumstances for purposes of varying an inter......
2 books & journal articles
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...354 (BCSC). 653 See Stannard v Stannard, [1991] AJ No 679 (Alta QB); Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Koivumaki v Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para 10; Jaggs v Jaggs, 2018 BCSC Colter v Colter, 2015 NSSC 2; Lipson v Lipson (1972), 7 RFL 186 (Ont CA); Carvell v Carvell, [1969] 2 O......
  • Child Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...354 (BCSC). 694 See Stannard v Stannard, [1991] AJ No 679 (Alta QB); Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Koivumaki v Lusan, 2014 BCSC 1198 at para 10; BDD v GTS, 2021 BCSC Colter v Colter, 2015 NSSC 2; Lipson v Lipson (1972), 7 RFL 186 (Ont CA); Carvell v Carvell, [1969] 2 OR 51......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT