Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Rooke |
| Citation | 2022 ABQB 188 |
| Docket Number | 1901 06547 |
| Date | 03 March 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...undertakings relate to an important issue in the application and it would not be too onerous to respond: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at paras 24 and 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chem......
-
MBH v CKI
...compel undertaking responses in the context of questioning on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Can......
-
Anderson v. His Majesty the King in the Right of Alberta
...only by relevance and materiality of the overall proceedings: see Rules, rr 5.17(1), 6.7, 6.20; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para [93] In conclusion, I find that BLCN is not obligated to produce oral history by way of disclo......
-
Zeinali v Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)
...Canada Inc v Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd, 2008 ABQB 671 at para. 7, 97 Alta LR (4th) 182, 459 AR 68; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para. 25(f), 82 CPC (8th) 65, affirmed 2022 ABCA 392 at paras. 20-21; J & H Singer Investments (No 1) Ltd v Sigma Realty Ltd (1957), ......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...undertakings relate to an important issue in the application and it would not be too onerous to respond: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at paras 24 and 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chem......
-
Astolfi v. Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...7; Bond Street at para 45; Colortech Painting and Decorating Ltd v Toh, 2000 ABQB 814 at para 26; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(f). Applications may involve the substantive merits of the action, only procedural matters, or a combination of both (as is the cas......
-
MBH v CKI
...compel undertaking responses in the context of questioning on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Can......
-
Carbone v. Dawes
...7; Bond Street at para 45; Colortech Painting and Decorating Ltd v Toh, 2000 ABQB 814 at para 26; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(f). Applications may involve the substantive merits of the action, only procedural matters, or a combination of both (as is the cas......
Get Started for Free
