Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
| Judge | Rooke |
| Citation | 2022 ABQB 188 |
| Date | 03 March 2022 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1901 06547 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.
...7; Bond Street at para 45; Colortech Painting and Decorating Ltd v Toh, 2000 ABQB 814 at para 26; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(f). Applications may involve the substantive merits of the action, only procedural matters, or a combination of both (as is the cas......
-
Mbh v Cki
...compel undertaking responses in the context of questioning on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Can......
-
Blazer Mechanical Plumbing & Heating Ltd v Delnor Construction 2012 Ltd
...in the balancing of factors but is still a factor to consider in light of the claim and the defence: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25 (k) & (l). I am mindful that the merits of an action may impact the next factor of whether the security for costs create und......
-
Anderson v HM the King in the Right of Alberta
...only by relevance and materiality of the overall proceedings: see Rules, rr 5.17(1), 6.7, 6.20; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para III. DISPOSITION 93 In conclusion, I find that BLCN is not obligated to produce oral history by way of disclosure. Oral history is not a......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
...7; Bond Street at para 45; Colortech Painting and Decorating Ltd v Toh, 2000 ABQB 814 at para 26; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(f). Applications may involve the substantive merits of the action, only procedural matters, or a combination of both (as is the cas......
-
Mbh v Cki,
...compel undertaking responses in the context of questioning on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Can......
-
Anderson v HM the King in the Right of Alberta,
...only by relevance and materiality of the overall proceedings: see Rules, rr 5.17(1), 6.7, 6.20; Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para III. DISPOSITION 93 In conclusion, I find that BLCN is not obligated to produce oral history by way of disclosure. Oral history is not a......
-
Blazer Mechanical Plumbing & Heating Ltd v Delnor Construction 2012 Ltd,
...in the balancing of factors but is still a factor to consider in light of the claim and the defence: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25 (k) & (l). I am mindful that the merits of an action may impact the next factor of whether the security for costs create und......
Get Started for Free