Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244

JudgeWoolley
Docket Number1301 05604
Citation2020 ABQB 244
Date08 April 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Zerbin v Vrbanek,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Diciembre 2020
    ...in its four-part test, although it also did not expressly reject it either. As Justice Woolley found in Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244, “subsequent appellate decisions suggest that the ongoing relevance of the intention requirement is uncertain: Precision Drilling Canada Limited......
  • Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 376
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Junio 2020
    ...Clement, Terry Lynn Clement, Lerry Hubbs, Robert Knoll and Mei Choon Knoll (“Plaintiffs”): Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244. Judgment was granted based on my finding that the Defendants Lester Hartland, Robert McCormick, Sandy Rizopoulos and Sun Star Energy Inc. comm......
  • 2023 ABCJ 109,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...the party advancing the claim, and the standard of proof for civil fraud is on a balance of probabilities: Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244 at paras 380-383. There is no evidence that Leo stole product, resold product or any evidence of payments to Leo by any other customers. Ther......
  • Lutz v Fabian Seed Farms Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • 16 Mayo 2023
    ...the party advancing the claim, and the standard of proof for civil fraud is on a balance of probabilities: Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244 at paras 380-383. There is no evidence that Leo stole product, resold product or any evidence of payments to Leo by any other customers. Ther......
4 cases
  • Zerbin v Vrbanek,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Diciembre 2020
    ...in its four-part test, although it also did not expressly reject it either. As Justice Woolley found in Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244, “subsequent appellate decisions suggest that the ongoing relevance of the intention requirement is uncertain: Precision Drilling Canada Limited......
  • Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 376
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Junio 2020
    ...Clement, Terry Lynn Clement, Lerry Hubbs, Robert Knoll and Mei Choon Knoll (“Plaintiffs”): Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244. Judgment was granted based on my finding that the Defendants Lester Hartland, Robert McCormick, Sandy Rizopoulos and Sun Star Energy Inc. comm......
  • 2023 ABCJ 109,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...the party advancing the claim, and the standard of proof for civil fraud is on a balance of probabilities: Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244 at paras 380-383. There is no evidence that Leo stole product, resold product or any evidence of payments to Leo by any other customers. Ther......
  • Lutz v Fabian Seed Farms Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • 16 Mayo 2023
    ...the party advancing the claim, and the standard of proof for civil fraud is on a balance of probabilities: Kowal v Sun Star Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 244 at paras 380-383. There is no evidence that Leo stole product, resold product or any evidence of payments to Leo by any other customers. Ther......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT