Krizans v. Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeL. A. PATTILLO J.
Citation2020 ONSC 4386
Docket Number271-19
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date22 July 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v Delongte, 2019 ONSC 6954; McNeil v McNeil, 2020 ONSC 1225; Niranjan v Rajaghatta, 2020 ONSC 1321 (Div Ct); Krizans v Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386; Jamieson v Jamieson, 2020 ONSC 5173. See also Crews v Bradford, 2018 ONSC 6413 (unmarried cohabitants). As to orders for the partition and/or sal......
  • Lacroix v. Central-McKinlay International Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 11, 2022
    ...to be admitted, the proposed fresh evidence must be potentially conclusive on an issue on appeal: Krizans v. Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 (Div. Ct.); Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 SCR 759.  In the immediate case, the proposed evidence is far-fetched and self-serving and is not corroborate......
  • Enofe v. Capreit Limited Partnership, 2020 ONSC 7113
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 15, 2020
    ...court cannot undertake a meaningful appellate review of her decision. Rather, as this court recently observed in Krizans v. Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 (Div. Ct.), at para. In considering whether reasons have fulfilled that function, the reviewing court should read the reasons as a whole, “in......
  • Hasse v Hasse,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...between the parties. (997897 Ontario Inc. v 926260 Ontario Ltd. [2001] OJ No. 3960 at para 10, 108 ACWS (3d) 922 and Krizans v Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 at para The onus is on the party opposing partition or sale to persuade the court that partition or sale should not be ordered. Here that ......
3 cases
  • Lacroix v. Central-McKinlay International Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 11, 2022
    ...to be admitted, the proposed fresh evidence must be potentially conclusive on an issue on appeal: Krizans v. Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 (Div. Ct.); Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 SCR 759.  In the immediate case, the proposed evidence is far-fetched and self-serving and is not corroborate......
  • Enofe v. Capreit Limited Partnership, 2020 ONSC 7113
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 15, 2020
    ...court cannot undertake a meaningful appellate review of her decision. Rather, as this court recently observed in Krizans v. Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 (Div. Ct.), at para. In considering whether reasons have fulfilled that function, the reviewing court should read the reasons as a whole, “in......
  • Hasse v Hasse,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...between the parties. (997897 Ontario Inc. v 926260 Ontario Ltd. [2001] OJ No. 3960 at para 10, 108 ACWS (3d) 922 and Krizans v Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386 at para The onus is on the party opposing partition or sale to persuade the court that partition or sale should not be ordered. Here that ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v Delongte, 2019 ONSC 6954; McNeil v McNeil, 2020 ONSC 1225; Niranjan v Rajaghatta, 2020 ONSC 1321 (Div Ct); Krizans v Skurdelis, 2020 ONSC 4386; Jamieson v Jamieson, 2020 ONSC 5173. See also Crews v Bradford, 2018 ONSC 6413 (unmarried cohabitants). As to orders for the partition and/or sal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT