L.C. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2016 ABQB 491
| Judge | Graesser, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | September 06, 2016 |
| Citations | 2016 ABQB 491 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Mbh v Cki,
...redactions at issue: Questor at para 126; Canadian Natural Resources Limited v ShawCor Ltd, 2014 ABCA 289 at paras 63-65; LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 491 at paras 38, 42 and 51. MBH's counsel provided the court the Redactions for this purpose, which I have reviewed and placed in a sealed f......
-
L.C. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2016 ABQB 512
...v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue) , 2007 SCC 2, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 38. I dealt with these principles recently in LC v Alberta , 2016 ABQB 491. I will briefly repeat excerpts from those cases and from R v Caron , 2011 SCC 5. [15] The test for advance costs relates to three things, ......
-
Think Fee Agreements Are Privileged? Think Again: Alberta Court Affirms Privilege Over Fee Agreements More Easily Overcome In Class Proceedings
...fee agreements in class proceedings, particularly where advance costs are sought by the class representative. Footnotes 1 LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 491 [LC]. 2 The reasons for certification of this class proceeding are at LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 151. 3 LC, supra note 1 at para 22. 4 British C......
-
L.C. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2016 ABQB 554
...Summary: The headnote and the decision for this document are in preparation. Introduction [1] Graesser, J. : In LC v Alberta , 2016 ABQB 491, I dealt with the Defendants' application to compel production of the retainer agreements between EMP and her counsel. At a case management confe......
3 cases
-
Mbh v Cki,
...redactions at issue: Questor at para 126; Canadian Natural Resources Limited v ShawCor Ltd, 2014 ABCA 289 at paras 63-65; LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 491 at paras 38, 42 and 51. MBH's counsel provided the court the Redactions for this purpose, which I have reviewed and placed in a sealed f......
-
L.C. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2016 ABQB 512
...v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue) , 2007 SCC 2, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 38. I dealt with these principles recently in LC v Alberta , 2016 ABQB 491. I will briefly repeat excerpts from those cases and from R v Caron , 2011 SCC 5. [15] The test for advance costs relates to three things, ......
-
L.C. et al. v. Alberta et al., 2016 ABQB 554
...Summary: The headnote and the decision for this document are in preparation. Introduction [1] Graesser, J. : In LC v Alberta , 2016 ABQB 491, I dealt with the Defendants' application to compel production of the retainer agreements between EMP and her counsel. At a case management confe......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Think Fee Agreements Are Privileged? Think Again: Alberta Court Affirms Privilege Over Fee Agreements More Easily Overcome In Class Proceedings
...fee agreements in class proceedings, particularly where advance costs are sought by the class representative. Footnotes 1 LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 491 [LC]. 2 The reasons for certification of this class proceeding are at LC v Alberta, 2016 ABQB 151. 3 LC, supra note 1 at para 22. 4 British C......