L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Barrow, J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2005 BCSC 1786 |
| Citation | 2005 BCSC 1786,[2005] B.C.T.C. 1786 (SC),26 RFL (6th) 386,[2005] BCJ No 2966 (QL),[2005] B.C.J. No 2966 (QL) |
| Date | 14 November 2005 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1786 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.027
L.G.B. (plaintiff) v. M.A.C.M. (defendant)
(64789; 2005 BCSC 1786)
Indexed As: L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Kelowna
Barrow, J.
November 14, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Family Law - Topic 1013
Common law, same-sex or adult interdependent relationships - Maintenance - See paragraphs 1 to 31.
Counsel:
R.J. Smith, for the plaintiff;
D.M. King, for the defendant.
This appeal was heard before Barrow, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following oral decision on November 14, 2005.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
A.R. v. M.E.R.,
...be ordered where it can be said a prima facie case for entitlement has been made out: LG.B. v. M.A.C.M., [2005] B.C.J. No. 2966, 2005 BCSC 1786 8. Where there is a need to resolve contested issues of fact, especially those connected with a threshold issue, such as entitlement, it becom......
-
Whatley v. Whatley, 2014 BCSC 536
...only be ordered where it can be said a prima facie case for entitlement has been made out: L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M. ,[2005] B.C.J. No.2966, 2005 BCSC 1786 (S.C.); 8. Where there is a need to resolve contested issues of fact, especially those connected with a threshold issue, such as entitlement, ......
-
Yake v. Chamberlain, 2014 BCSC 1582
...v. Bowman , 1998 CanLII 4697 (BCSC), Newson v. Newson , 1998 CanLII 6440 (BCCA), Rogers v. Lowe , 2001 BCSC 1563, and L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M., 2005 BCSC 1786. [45] The law from other decisions is summarized in L.G.B ., as follows: [14] From the foregoing, four points may be distilled. First, giv......
-
J.L.S. v. D.W. et al., 2010 BCSC 1537
...affidavit material and the fact that the question of entitlement is at stake, a decision ought to be made ( L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M. , 2005 BCSC 1786 [ L.G.B. ] at para. 2). Barrow J. summarized the key points in L.G.B. as follows: [14] From the foregoing, four points may be distilled. First, giv......
-
A.R. v. M.E.R.,
...be ordered where it can be said a prima facie case for entitlement has been made out: LG.B. v. M.A.C.M., [2005] B.C.J. No. 2966, 2005 BCSC 1786 8. Where there is a need to resolve contested issues of fact, especially those connected with a threshold issue, such as entitlement, it becom......
-
Whatley v. Whatley, 2014 BCSC 536
...only be ordered where it can be said a prima facie case for entitlement has been made out: L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M. ,[2005] B.C.J. No.2966, 2005 BCSC 1786 (S.C.); 8. Where there is a need to resolve contested issues of fact, especially those connected with a threshold issue, such as entitlement, ......
-
Yake v. Chamberlain, 2014 BCSC 1582
...v. Bowman , 1998 CanLII 4697 (BCSC), Newson v. Newson , 1998 CanLII 6440 (BCCA), Rogers v. Lowe , 2001 BCSC 1563, and L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M., 2005 BCSC 1786. [45] The law from other decisions is summarized in L.G.B ., as follows: [14] From the foregoing, four points may be distilled. First, giv......
-
J.L.S. v. D.W. et al., 2010 BCSC 1537
...affidavit material and the fact that the question of entitlement is at stake, a decision ought to be made ( L.G.B. v. M.A.C.M. , 2005 BCSC 1786 [ L.G.B. ] at para. 2). Barrow J. summarized the key points in L.G.B. as follows: [14] From the foregoing, four points may be distilled. First, giv......