L.A.U. v. I.B.U., [2016] A.R. Uned. 124 (QB)

JudgeMichalyshyn, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation[2016] A.R. Uned. 124 (QB),[2016] A.R. Uned. 124,2016 ABQB 74
Date09 February 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...2021 ONSC 6410. 190 Aldush v Alani, 2021 ONSC 6410 at para 27. 191 Mayfield v Mayfield, [2001] OJ No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74; AR v AVR, 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich, 2016 BCSC 1529; Arulsothynathan v Ganeshalingam, 2021 BCSC 946; Green v Green, 2022 NSSC 1......
  • Remedies Available under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also AR v AVR , 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich , 2016 BCSC 1529; M v F , 2015 ONCA 277. And see LAU v IBU , 2016 ABQB 74, citing Gould et al, “Critiquing a Colleague’s Forensic Advisory Report: A Suggested Protocol for Application to Child Custody Evaluations”......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...v Kapyrka, 2017 NBQB 168 281, 301 Larre v Cross, [1998] SJ No 851 (QB) 587 Laskosky v Laskosky, [1999] AJ No 131 (QB) 374 LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74 583 LAU v LLL, 2016 PESC 3 335 Lauder v Lauder, [1949] P 277 (Eng) 169 Launchbury v Launchbury (2005), 12 RFL (6th) 393 (Ont CA) 604 Lavallée v T......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...it is not so 193 Aldush v Alani, 2021 ONSC 6410 at para 27. 194 Mayfield v Mayfield, [2001] OJ No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74; AR v AVR, 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich, 2016 BCSC 1529; Arulsothynathan v Ganeshalingam, 2021 BCSC 946; M v F, 2015 ONCA 277. And see......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • PLC v CG, 2020 ABQB 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 27, 2020
    ...cases and non-family cases: Metz v Weisgerber, 2004 ABCA 151 at paras 18 and 27; MacPhail v Karasek, 2006 ABCA 354 at para 9; LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74, Michalyshyn J at para 231. [6] “Success” does not demand success on each issue. A party is successful if that party has had substantial succ......
  • AE v. TE, 2017 ABQB 449
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2017
    ...and the inconsistency or consistency of these matters with other interests of the child may be relevant considerations. See LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74, Michalyshyn J at paras 203-204.6. Special Needs[33] A child may have special physical or psychological needs. One parent or the other may be b......
  • JO v JS, 2020 ABQB 777
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 11, 2020
    ...to an expert, or to anyone else for that matter: RKC v GSA, 2012 ABQB 614 at paras 213-14; AJU v GSU, 2015 ABQB 6 at para 177; LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74 at para 187; AE v TE, 2017 ABQB 449 at para 113. As stated by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Prediger v Santoro, 2016 ABCA 11, at para 25 (u......
  • JSV v CGR, 2018 ABQB 247
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 29, 2018
    ...a custody dispute to better reimburse the parent for costs incurred. These authorities were reviewed by Justice Michalyshyn in LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74, at paragraphs 231-236. In that decision, the unsuccessful party made unproven allegations of racism and discrimination, and a multiple of C......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...v Kapyrka, 2017 NBQB 168 281, 301 Larre v Cross, [1998] SJ No 851 (QB) 587 Laskosky v Laskosky, [1999] AJ No 131 (QB) 374 LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74 583 LAU v LLL, 2016 PESC 3 335 Lauder v Lauder, [1949] P 277 (Eng) 169 Launchbury v Launchbury (2005), 12 RFL (6th) 393 (Ont CA) 604 Lavallée v T......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...it is not so 193 Aldush v Alani, 2021 ONSC 6410 at para 27. 194 Mayfield v Mayfield, [2001] OJ No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74; AR v AVR, 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich, 2016 BCSC 1529; Arulsothynathan v Ganeshalingam, 2021 BCSC 946; M v F, 2015 ONCA 277. And see......
  • Remedies Available under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also AR v AVR , 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich , 2016 BCSC 1529; M v F , 2015 ONCA 277. And see LAU v IBU , 2016 ABQB 74, citing Gould et al, “Critiquing a Colleague’s Forensic Advisory Report: A Suggested Protocol for Application to Child Custody Evaluations”......
  • Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...2021 ONSC 6410. 190 Aldush v Alani, 2021 ONSC 6410 at para 27. 191 Mayfield v Mayfield, [2001] OJ No 2212 (Sup Ct); see also LAU v IBU, 2016 ABQB 74; AR v AVR, 2016 BCSC 629; Dimitrijevic v Pavlovich, 2016 BCSC 1529; Arulsothynathan v Ganeshalingam, 2021 BCSC 946; Green v Green, 2022 NSSC 1......