L.A.W. v. Children’s Aid Society of Rainy River (District)

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeG.P. Smith, J.
Citation[2005] O.T.C. 470 (SC)
Date28 April 2005
Subject MatterPRACTICE,INJUNCTIONS

L.A.W. v. CAS, [2005] O.T.C. 470 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] O.T.C. TBEd. JN.067

L.A.W. (plaintiff) v. Family & Children’s Services, District of Rainy River, Incorporated as the Children’s Aid Society (defendant)

(Court File No. CV-05-00108)

Indexed As: L.A.W. v. Children’s Aid Society of Rainy River (District)

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

G.P. Smith, J.

April 28, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Injunctions - Topic 7124

Particular matters - Particular interests protected - Aboriginal rights - See paragraphs 19 to 46.

Practice - Topic 8954

Appeals - Stay of proceedings pending appeal - What constitutes “irreparable harm” - See paragraphs 23 to 38.

Practice - Topic 8958

Appeals - Stay of proceedings pending appeal - Balance of convenience and justice - See paragraphs 39 to 45.

Cases Noticed:

RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311; 164 N.R. 1; 60 Q.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 20].

Circuit World Corp. v. Lesperance et al. (1997), 104 O.A.C. 59; 33 O.R.(3d) 674 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21].

Centre Ice Ltd. v. National Hockey League et al. (1994), 166 N.R. 44; 53 C.P.R.(3d) 34 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

Lassonde (A.) Inc. v. Island Oasis Canada Inc. et al., [2001] 2 F.C. 568; 273 N.R. 179 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

Syntex Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd. (1991), 126 N.R. 114; 36 C.P.R.(3d) 129 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

Edgar v. Kitasoo Indian Band Council, [2003] 2 C.N.L.R. 124; 228 F.T.R. 161 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 26].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Sharpe, Robert J., Injunctions and Specific Performance, p. 2-41 [para. 39].

Counsel:

Chris Arnone, for the plaintiff;

Lydia Stam, for the defendant.

This application was heard at Thunder Bay, Ontario, on April 25 and 27, 2005, by G.P. Smith, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on April 28, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex