Lafarge Canada Inc. v. JJM Construction Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1851 (SC)

JudgeC.L. Smith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateDecember 24, 2010
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1851 (SC);[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1851;2010 BCSC 1851
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Lafarge Canada Inc. v. JJM Construction Ltd., (2011) 312 B.C.A.C. 253 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 6, 2011
    ...in both her reasons granting Lafarge leave to appeal the arbitral award ( 2010 BCSC 1168 ), and in her reasons dismissing the appeal (2010 BCSC 1851, 78 B.L.R.(4th) 300 ). [4] Each charter party contains the following provisions: 5. The Charterer shall during the charter term keep and main......
  • Creston Moly Corp. v. Sattva Capital Corp., 2011 BCSC 597
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 6, 2011
    ...has not determine the degree of deference to be applied to this type of question. [34] In Lafarge Canada Inc. v. JJM Construction Ltd ., 2010 BCSC 1851, Madam Justice Smith, following Western Forest Products , applied the Dunsmuir analysis and held, contrary to the outcome in Western Forest......
2 cases
  • Lafarge Canada Inc. v. JJM Construction Ltd., (2011) 312 B.C.A.C. 253 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 6, 2011
    ...in both her reasons granting Lafarge leave to appeal the arbitral award ( 2010 BCSC 1168 ), and in her reasons dismissing the appeal (2010 BCSC 1851, 78 B.L.R.(4th) 300 ). [4] Each charter party contains the following provisions: 5. The Charterer shall during the charter term keep and main......
  • Creston Moly Corp. v. Sattva Capital Corp., 2011 BCSC 597
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 6, 2011
    ...has not determine the degree of deference to be applied to this type of question. [34] In Lafarge Canada Inc. v. JJM Construction Ltd ., 2010 BCSC 1851, Madam Justice Smith, following Western Forest Products , applied the Dunsmuir analysis and held, contrary to the outcome in Western Forest......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT