Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | C. Horkins J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 2670 |
| Date | 29 April 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | FS-15-20362-00 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan et. al., 2020 ONSC 3209
...urgent to justify a temporary variation in the support amounts payable. There is also the decision of Horkins J. in Lakhtakia v. Mehra (2020 ONSC 2670), which I did not point out to the parties during the conference call. In that case, Horkins J. found that the circumstances before her were......
-
Skinner v. Skinner, 2020 ONSC 3226
...Finally, while being laid off work might qualify as a “dire issue regarding the parties’ financial circumstances” (Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670), the moving party must present some material to persuade the court that the motion is urgent in his specific case. The respondent has provid......
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan, 2020 ONSC 7705
...at best.” [38] Further, once an interim order is established, the parties are discouraged from litigating over it. In Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670, Horkins J. stated (at para. [19] Temporary orders are meant to provide “a reasonably acceptable solution to a difficult problem until tri......
3 cases
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan et. al., 2020 ONSC 3209
...urgent to justify a temporary variation in the support amounts payable. There is also the decision of Horkins J. in Lakhtakia v. Mehra (2020 ONSC 2670), which I did not point out to the parties during the conference call. In that case, Horkins J. found that the circumstances before her were......
-
Skinner v. Skinner, 2020 ONSC 3226
...Finally, while being laid off work might qualify as a “dire issue regarding the parties’ financial circumstances” (Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670), the moving party must present some material to persuade the court that the motion is urgent in his specific case. The respondent has provid......
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan, 2020 ONSC 7705
...at best.” [38] Further, once an interim order is established, the parties are discouraged from litigating over it. In Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670, Horkins J. stated (at para. [19] Temporary orders are meant to provide “a reasonably acceptable solution to a difficult problem until tri......