Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeFavreau,George,Paciocco
Citation2022 ONCA 789
Docket NumberM53690; C70419
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date16 November 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 30, 2023
    ...25(19), Kim v. McIntosh, 2020 ONSC 719, Drygala v. Pauli (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 711 (C.A.), Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, Bailey v. Barbour, 2012 ON......
  • 2023 ONCA 74,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a trial that he was not permitted to participate in as the result of his pleadings being struck. As this court held in Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, at para. 3: [t]his court will not typically hear an appeal by a party from an unopposed proceeding. Participation in an appeal after an unc......
  • Wilson v Fatahi-Ghandehari,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 2, 2023
    ...a trial that he was not permitted to participate in as the result of his pleadings being struck. As this court held in Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, at para. 3: [t]his court will not typically hear an appeal by a party from an unopposed proceeding. Participation in an appeal after an unc......
  • Kim v McIntosh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 18, 2023
    ...it is doubtful that the appellant has standing to challenge the merits of the order made in the uncontested trial: Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789. We need not decide that issue, as we see no error in the order made by Steele J. Despite the appellant's decision that he would not comply......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Wilson v Fatahi-Ghandehari,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 2, 2023
    ...a trial that he was not permitted to participate in as the result of his pleadings being struck. As this court held in Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, at para. 3: [t]his court will not typically hear an appeal by a party from an unopposed proceeding. Participation in an appeal after an unc......
  • 2023 ONCA 74,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a trial that he was not permitted to participate in as the result of his pleadings being struck. As this court held in Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, at para. 3: [t]his court will not typically hear an appeal by a party from an unopposed proceeding. Participation in an appeal after an unc......
  • 2023 ONCA 356,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...it is doubtful that the appellant has standing to challenge the merits of the order made in the uncontested trial: Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789. We need not decide that issue, as we see no error in the order made by Steele J. Despite the appellant's decision that he would not comply......
  • Kim v McIntosh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 18, 2023
    ...it is doubtful that the appellant has standing to challenge the merits of the order made in the uncontested trial: Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789. We need not decide that issue, as we see no error in the order made by Steele J. Despite the appellant's decision that he would not comply......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 30, 2023
    ...25(19), Kim v. McIntosh, 2020 ONSC 719, Drygala v. Pauli (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 711 (C.A.), Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789, Gray v. Gray, 2017 ONCA 100, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, Bailey v. Barbour, 2012 ON......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT