Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corp. v. Marino, [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 1671 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | D. Brown, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Date | 17 March 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Gravenhurst (Town) v. Stephenson et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 5370
...declared vexatious, can include the staying of actions until outstanding cost orders are paid: Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corp. v. Marino, 2011 ONSC 1671. [9] A vexatious litigant is not deprived of the right to bring proceedings. Rather, the vexatious litigant, once so declared, must establi......
-
The Privatization of Justice in Québec's Draft Bill to Enact the New Code of Civil Procedure: A Critical Evaluation
...59 OR (2d) 353, 37 DLR (4th) 685 (Ont H Ct J); Wong v Giannacopoulos, 2011 ABCA 206, [2011] AWLD 3133; Landmark Vehicle Leasing v Marino, 2011 ONSC 1671 (available at CanLII); Lukezic v Royal Bank, 2011 ONSC 5263, 206 ACWS (3d) 735. 161 See Yves-Marie Morissette, “Abus de droit, quérulence ......
-
Dobson v. Green, 2012 ONSC 4432
...order can include the staying of pending actions until any outstanding costs orders are paid. See: Landmark Vehicle Leasing v. Marino , 2011 ONSC 1671. IV The Evidence on the Application A. The History of the Allegedly Vexatious Litigation 1. Introduction [14] In support of this application......
-
Hudgins v. Hudgins, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2133 (SC)
...whether by way of further motion, appeals or other step, until outstanding cost orders are paid. ( Landmark Vehicle Leasing v. Marino , 2011 ONSC 1671 para. 47). [34] The importance of the application of section 140(1) in matrimonial proceedings was delineated by the Court of Appeal in Ball......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Gravenhurst (Town) v. Stephenson et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 5370
...declared vexatious, can include the staying of actions until outstanding cost orders are paid: Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corp. v. Marino, 2011 ONSC 1671. [9] A vexatious litigant is not deprived of the right to bring proceedings. Rather, the vexatious litigant, once so declared, must establi......
-
Dobson v. Green, 2012 ONSC 4432
...order can include the staying of pending actions until any outstanding costs orders are paid. See: Landmark Vehicle Leasing v. Marino , 2011 ONSC 1671. IV The Evidence on the Application A. The History of the Allegedly Vexatious Litigation 1. Introduction [14] In support of this application......
-
Hudgins v. Hudgins, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2133 (SC)
...whether by way of further motion, appeals or other step, until outstanding cost orders are paid. ( Landmark Vehicle Leasing v. Marino , 2011 ONSC 1671 para. 47). [34] The importance of the application of section 140(1) in matrimonial proceedings was delineated by the Court of Appeal in Ball......
-
Dyce v. Lyons-Batstone, 2012 ONSC 490
...this order can include the staying of actions until outstanding costs orders are paid: see Landmark Vehicle Leasing v. Marino , 2011 ONSC 1671. 2. Analysis - Wayne Dyce [57] As noted, Wayne Dyce has commenced a number of lawsuits as follows: ∙ Four years of protracted litigation against Mer......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Privatization of Justice in Québec's Draft Bill to Enact the New Code of Civil Procedure: A Critical Evaluation
...59 OR (2d) 353, 37 DLR (4th) 685 (Ont H Ct J); Wong v Giannacopoulos, 2011 ABCA 206, [2011] AWLD 3133; Landmark Vehicle Leasing v Marino, 2011 ONSC 1671 (available at CanLII); Lukezic v Royal Bank, 2011 ONSC 5263, 206 ACWS (3d) 735. 161 See Yves-Marie Morissette, “Abus de droit, quérulence ......