Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Punnett
Citation2018 BCSC 1463
Date30 August 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number18-0084
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Skene v. Ucluelet (District), 2019 BCSC 2051
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2019
    ...agreements, arbitrations, or other considerations that could resolve the deficiencies that permeate the SROW: Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 at paras. 28–30; Newco Investments Corporation v. British Columbia Transit (1987), 14 B.C.L.R. (2d) 212 at 222–223 (C.A.) [Newco]. The Petitioner......
  • NBC Holdings Ltd. v. Aarts Nursery Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 12, 2021
    ...or modify the easement is constrained by subsection (2). This point was succinctly summarized by Justice Punnett in Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 [Langlois] (aff’d with minor variance in 2019 BCCA 95) at para. For the petitioners to succeed on their application under s. 35 of the Prop......
  • Vida (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 23, 2021
    ...Justice Punnett summarized how to determine whether s.35(2)(b) is satisfied in Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 (aff'd with variance of another issue at 2019 BCCA [32]        Section 35(2)(b) of the Property Law Act provides that “the r......
  • St. Hilaire v. 0772255 BC Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 13, 2022
    ...fide easement is “almost automatically a diminution of the practical benefit of the Easement”: see Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 at para. 35, quoting Wallster v. Erschbamer, 2011 BCCA 27 at para. 21. While both of those decisions involved applications to modify......
4 cases
  • NBC Holdings Ltd. v. Aarts Nursery Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 12, 2021
    ...or modify the easement is constrained by subsection (2). This point was succinctly summarized by Justice Punnett in Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 [Langlois] (aff’d with minor variance in 2019 BCCA 95) at para. For the petitioners to succeed on their application under s. 35 of the Prop......
  • Skene v. Ucluelet (District), 2019 BCSC 2051
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2019
    ...agreements, arbitrations, or other considerations that could resolve the deficiencies that permeate the SROW: Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 at paras. 28–30; Newco Investments Corporation v. British Columbia Transit (1987), 14 B.C.L.R. (2d) 212 at 222–223 (C.A.) [Newco]. The Petitioner......
  • Vida (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 23, 2021
    ...Justice Punnett summarized how to determine whether s.35(2)(b) is satisfied in Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 (aff'd with variance of another issue at 2019 BCCA [32]        Section 35(2)(b) of the Property Law Act provides that “the r......
  • St. Hilaire v. 0772255 BC Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 13, 2022
    ...fide easement is “almost automatically a diminution of the practical benefit of the Easement”: see Langlois v. Tessaro, 2018 BCSC 1463 at para. 35, quoting Wallster v. Erschbamer, 2011 BCCA 27 at para. 21. While both of those decisions involved applications to modify......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT