Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2012 ONSC 3582
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | K.L. Campbell, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,EVIDENCE |
| Citation | 2012 ONSC 3582,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3582,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3582 (SC) |
| Date | 19 June 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Actava TV, Inc. v. Matvil Corp, 2021 ONCA 105
...judge set out the Friction Division factors but treated the factors as preconditions and misapplied them: at paras. 67-71, rev’g 2012 ONSC 3582, 25 C.P.C. (7th) 256. Further, appellate intervention may be warranted where the application judge fails to give sufficient consideration to......
-
Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2012 ONSC 4780
...of documents and testimony from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL). See: Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. , 2012 ONSC 3582. [2] The only remaining issue is costs. Following the release of the Reasons for Decision , I received and considered written submissions ......
2 cases
-
Actava TV, Inc. v. Matvil Corp, 2021 ONCA 105
...judge set out the Friction Division factors but treated the factors as preconditions and misapplied them: at paras. 67-71, rev’g 2012 ONSC 3582, 25 C.P.C. (7th) 256. Further, appellate intervention may be warranted where the application judge fails to give sufficient consideration to......
-
Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2012 ONSC 4780
...of documents and testimony from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL). See: Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. , 2012 ONSC 3582. [2] The only remaining issue is costs. Following the release of the Reasons for Decision , I received and considered written submissions ......