LAWLESS v. CONSEIL SCOLAIRE FRANSASKOIS, 2020 SKQB 27

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeMITCHELL J.
Citation2020 SKQB 27
Date30 January 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 1494 of 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • TRAFFORD v. TD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2020 SKQB 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 1, 2020
    ...defendants be allowed to delay proceedings through obstructive tactics. [23] Mitchell J., in Lawless v Conseil Scolaire Fransaskois, 2020 SKQB 27, applied Rule 5-14 to strike a claim for failure to serve the plaintiff’s affidavit of documents. Mitchell J. began his analysis, at para. [45] …......
  • FEDERATED CO‑OPERATIVES LIMITED v. AJIT TRANSPORT INC.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 22, 2022
    ...FCL points to Lawless v Conseil Scolaire Fransaskois, 2020 SKQB 27 [Lawless], and Russel Estate v TD Life Insurance Company, 2020 SKQB 87 [Russel], to support its argument that for having simply ignored a court order, AJIT should pay the price of having its statement of defence [23] &#......
2 cases
  • TRAFFORD v. TD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2020 SKQB 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 1, 2020
    ...defendants be allowed to delay proceedings through obstructive tactics. [23] Mitchell J., in Lawless v Conseil Scolaire Fransaskois, 2020 SKQB 27, applied Rule 5-14 to strike a claim for failure to serve the plaintiff’s affidavit of documents. Mitchell J. began his analysis, at para. [45] …......
  • FEDERATED CO‑OPERATIVES LIMITED v. AJIT TRANSPORT INC.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 22, 2022
    ...FCL points to Lawless v Conseil Scolaire Fransaskois, 2020 SKQB 27 [Lawless], and Russel Estate v TD Life Insurance Company, 2020 SKQB 87 [Russel], to support its argument that for having simply ignored a court order, AJIT should pay the price of having its statement of defence [23] &#......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT