Lee, Re, (1980) 31 N.R. 136 (FCA)
Judge | Heald and Le Dain, JJ. and Kerr, D.J. |
Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Case Date | January 14, 1980 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1980), 31 N.R. 136 (FCA) |
Lee, Re (1980), 31 N.R. 136 (FCA)
MLB headnote and full text
Re Lee Attorney General of Canada v. Murby, Butchart, and Lee (sitting as an Appeal Board) and Lee
(A-98-79)
Indexed As: Lee, Re
Federal Court of Appeal
Heald and Le Dain, JJ. and Kerr, D.J.
January 14, 1980.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Labour Law - Topic 9218
Public service labour relations - Job selection - Appeal of job selection to an appeal board, scope of appeal - Public Service Staff Relations Act, s. 112 - A public service employee entered a closed job competition and was placed first on an eligible list in order of merit - The employee was not appointed to the job because a qualification for the job was "top secret security clearance" which the employee was denied by the R.C.M.P. - The employee appealed to an appeal board appointed under s. 21 of the Public Service Employment Act - The appeal board allowed the employee's appeal on the ground that the denial of security clearance to the employee was not justified - The Federal Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the appeal board on the ground that s. 112 of the Public Service Staff Relations Act precluded the appeal board from considering or inquiring into a security clearance job qualification.
Cases Noticed:
Brown v. Public Service Commission, 9 N.R. 493; [1975] F.C. 345, refd to. [para. 7].
Statutes Noticed:
Public Service Staff Relations Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. P-35, sect. 112 [para. 11].
Public Service Employment Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. P-32, sect. 10.
Authors and Works Noticed:
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd Ed. [para. 26].
Counsel:
W.J.A. Hobson, Q.C., for the applicant;
No one appearing for respondents P. Murby, L. Butchart and J.D. Lee;
M.W. Wright, Q.C., for the respondent R. Lee.
This appeal was heard by HEALD and LE DAIN, JJ. and KERR, D.J. of the Federal Court of Appeal at Ottawa, Ontario on November 20, 1979.
The judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal was delivered on January 14, 1980 and the following opinions were filed:
HEALD, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 19.
LE DAIN, J. - see paragraphs 20 to 24.
KERR, D.J. - see paragraphs 25 to 29.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thomson v. Canada (Minister of Agriculture), (1992) 133 N.R. 345 (SCC)
...27. Cases Noticed: Lee v. Attorney General of Canada, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 90; 38 N.R. 346, refd to. [para. 12]. Lee, Re, [1981] 1 F.C. 713; 31 N.R. 136 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. Attorney General of Canada v. Murby - see Lee, Re. Multiform Manufacturing Co. Ltd. et al. v. R. et al., [1990] ......
-
Lee v. Attorney General of Canada, (1981) 38 N.R. 346 (SCC)
...on the ground that the denial of security clearance to the employee was not justified. The Federal Court of Appeal in a judgment reported 31 N.R. 136 set aside the decision of the Appeal Board on the ground that the requirement of security clearance could not be evaluated or assessed by sel......
-
Thomson v. Canada (Minister of Agriculture), (1992) 133 N.R. 345 (SCC)
...27. Cases Noticed: Lee v. Attorney General of Canada, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 90; 38 N.R. 346, refd to. [para. 12]. Lee, Re, [1981] 1 F.C. 713; 31 N.R. 136 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. Attorney General of Canada v. Murby - see Lee, Re. Multiform Manufacturing Co. Ltd. et al. v. R. et al., [1990] ......
-
Lee v. Attorney General of Canada, (1981) 38 N.R. 346 (SCC)
...on the ground that the denial of security clearance to the employee was not justified. The Federal Court of Appeal in a judgment reported 31 N.R. 136 set aside the decision of the Appeal Board on the ground that the requirement of security clearance could not be evaluated or assessed by sel......