Lee v. Zhou,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Tucker |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 172 |
| Date | 03 February 2022 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S2013478 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 351,
...oft-cited factors from Miracle Feeds which guide a court's discretion in setting aside a default judgment. As summarized in Lee v. Zhou, 2022 BCSC 172 at para. 43, the Miracle Feeds factors are whether: (1) the defendant wilfully or deliberately failed to respond to the claim; (2) the defen......
-
Tang v Goldmanis,
...oft-cited factors from Miracle Feeds which guide a court's discretion in setting aside a default judgment. As summarized in Lee v. Zhou, 2022 BCSC 172 at para. 43, the Miracle Feeds factors are whether: (1) the defendant wilfully or deliberately failed to respond to the claim; (2) the defen......
2 cases
-
2024 BCSC 351,
...oft-cited factors from Miracle Feeds which guide a court's discretion in setting aside a default judgment. As summarized in Lee v. Zhou, 2022 BCSC 172 at para. 43, the Miracle Feeds factors are whether: (1) the defendant wilfully or deliberately failed to respond to the claim; (2) the defen......
-
Tang v Goldmanis,
...oft-cited factors from Miracle Feeds which guide a court's discretion in setting aside a default judgment. As summarized in Lee v. Zhou, 2022 BCSC 172 at para. 43, the Miracle Feeds factors are whether: (1) the defendant wilfully or deliberately failed to respond to the claim; (2) the defen......