Leontowicz v. Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Mr. Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf |
Citation | 2020 ABCA 324 |
Docket Number | 2003-0063AC |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Date | 17 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...(1996), 29 RFL (4th) 237, [1996] NWTJ No 113 (SC)....................................................... 79, 82 Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324..................................................................................................443, 444 Leopold v Leopold, [2001] OJ No 33......
-
Form and Types of Order
...relevant evidence.98 Anderson v Anderson, [2000] AJ No 752 (QB); McInnes v Young, [1998] NWTJ No 91 (SC). See Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para 9; Rolinger v Rolinger, 2021 ABQB 474; Drozdzik v Drozdzik (1992), 39 RFL (3d) 138 (BCCA); Cherewyk v Cherewyk, 2018 MBCA 13; Dumont v......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...order); Boudreau v Boudreau, 2015 SKCA 65; Cross v Batters, 2016 SKCA 71; Potzus v Potzus, 2017 SKCA 15. 700 Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para 9; Phillips v Phillips (1985), 43 RFL (2d) 462 at 463 (BCCA); Loesch v Walji, 2008 BCCA 214; Benoit v Benoit, 2019 MBCA 106; Hickey v H......
-
Malazdrewicz v Malazdrewicz,
...support order on an interim basis. As this court has repeatedly directed on multiple occasions, including in Leontowicz v. Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para Interim support orders are intended to be temporary; they are often made on an imperfect record and are intended to strike an interim ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Malazdrewicz v Malazdrewicz,
...support order on an interim basis. As this court has repeatedly directed on multiple occasions, including in Leontowicz v. Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para Interim support orders are intended to be temporary; they are often made on an imperfect record and are intended to strike an interim ......
-
Witt v Johnson,
...Court of Appeal discourages the bringing of applications to vary interim support orders. Most recently in Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324, at para 9, the Court of Appeal Interim support orders are intended to be temporary; they are often made on an imperfect record and are intended t......
-
Maurier v Maurier,
...Our Court of Appeal has provided litigants with guidance respecting interim orders. In Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324, at para 9 we read the [9] Interim support orders are intended to be temporary; they are often made on an imperfect record ......
-
Paskaran v Paskaran,
...[244] Our Court of Appeal has provided litigants with guidance respecting interim orders. In Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324, at para 9 we read the [9] Interim support orders are intended to be temporary; they are often made on an imperfect record and ar......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...(1996), 29 RFL (4th) 237, [1996] NWTJ No 113 (SC)....................................................... 79, 82 Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324..................................................................................................443, 444 Leopold v Leopold, [2001] OJ No 33......
-
Form and Types of Order
...relevant evidence.98 Anderson v Anderson, [2000] AJ No 752 (QB); McInnes v Young, [1998] NWTJ No 91 (SC). See Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para 9; Rolinger v Rolinger, 2021 ABQB 474; Drozdzik v Drozdzik (1992), 39 RFL (3d) 138 (BCCA); Cherewyk v Cherewyk, 2018 MBCA 13; Dumont v......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...order); Boudreau v Boudreau, 2015 SKCA 65; Cross v Batters, 2016 SKCA 71; Potzus v Potzus, 2017 SKCA 15. 700 Leontowicz v Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324 at para 9; Phillips v Phillips (1985), 43 RFL (2d) 462 at 463 (BCCA); Loesch v Walji, 2008 BCCA 214; Benoit v Benoit, 2019 MBCA 106; Hickey v H......