Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin, (1984) 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (QB)
Judge | Helper, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
Case Date | May 11, 1984 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (QB) |
Lethbridge v. Lethbridge (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin
(Suit No. 25018 D.P.)
Indexed As: Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench
Helper, J.
May 11, 1984.
Summary:
A wife petitioned for, inter alia, divorce and maintenance for herself. The wife had waived her right to maintenance in a separation agreement.
The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench granted the divorce. The court refused to disturb the separation agreement respecting maintenance.
Family Law - Topic 4006
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance awards - Effect of separation agreement - Pursuant to a separation agreement, a wife waived her maintenance rights - She received legal advice but maintained that her concern at the time was returning to the matrimonial home for the sake of her son - The wife knew at the time that the husband's income would increase faster than her own and that her expenses in the matrimonial home would be substantial - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench refused to set aside the separation agreement and thus denied the wife maintenance upon divorce - See paragraphs 6 to 14.
Cases Noticed:
Ross v. Ross (1984), 26 Man.R.(2d) 123, dist. [para. 4].
Thompson v. Thompson and Spence (1974), 16 R.F.L. 158 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Farquar v. Farquar (1983), 1 D.L.R.(4th) 244 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Campbell v. Campbell (1978), 7 R.F.L.(2d) 285 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Newman v. Newman (1980), 4 Man.R.(2d) 50, consd. [para. 14].
Daly v. Daly (1980), 4 Man.R.(2d) 63, not appld. [para. 14].
Katz v. Katz (1983), 21 Man.R.(2d) 1, dist. [para. 14].
Neffgen v. Neffgen (1983), 24 Man.R.(2d) 118, dist. [para. 14].
Counsel:
D. Langtry, for the petitioner;
T. Goodman, for the respondent.
This petition was heard before Helper, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, whose decision was delivered on May 11, 1984.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lindsay v. Lindsay, (1989) 59 Man.R.(2d) 186 (QB)
...to. [para. 37]. Ross v. Ross (1984), 26 Man.R.(2d) 122; 39 R.F.L.(2d) 51 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 37]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Crouse v. Crouse (1988), 88 N.S.R.(2d) 199; 225 A.P.R. 199 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 37]. Pelech v. Pelech, [19......
-
Lay v. Lay, (1985) 34 Man.R.(2d) 69 (QBFD)
...[para. 16]. Katz v. Katz and Scott (1983), 21 Man.R.(2d) 1 (Man. C.A.), consd. [para. 16]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105; 40 R.F.L.(2d) 170 (Man. Q.B.), consd. [para. Campbell v. Campbell (1978), 7 R.F.L.(2d) 285 (O.C.A.), consd. [para. 16]. Dragun v. Dragun ......
-
Brockie v. Brockie, (1987) 46 Man.R.(2d) 33 (QBFD)
...(1984), 39 R.F.L.(2d) 51; 26 Man.R.(2d) 122 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin (1984), 40 R.F.L.(2d) 170; 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Campbell v. Campbell (1978), 7 R.F.L.(2d) 285 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. Dragun v. Dragun and Epstein (198......
-
Lindsay v. Lindsay, (1989) 59 Man.R.(2d) 186 (QB)
...to. [para. 37]. Ross v. Ross (1984), 26 Man.R.(2d) 122; 39 R.F.L.(2d) 51 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 37]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Crouse v. Crouse (1988), 88 N.S.R.(2d) 199; 225 A.P.R. 199 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 37]. Pelech v. Pelech, [19......
-
Lay v. Lay, (1985) 34 Man.R.(2d) 69 (QBFD)
...[para. 16]. Katz v. Katz and Scott (1983), 21 Man.R.(2d) 1 (Man. C.A.), consd. [para. 16]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin (1984), 28 Man.R.(2d) 105; 40 R.F.L.(2d) 170 (Man. Q.B.), consd. [para. Campbell v. Campbell (1978), 7 R.F.L.(2d) 285 (O.C.A.), consd. [para. 16]. Dragun v. Dragun ......
-
Brockie v. Brockie, (1987) 46 Man.R.(2d) 33 (QBFD)
...(1984), 39 R.F.L.(2d) 51; 26 Man.R.(2d) 122 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. Lethbridge v. Lethbridge and Martin (1984), 40 R.F.L.(2d) 170; 28 Man.R.(2d) 105 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Campbell v. Campbell (1978), 7 R.F.L.(2d) 285 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. Dragun v. Dragun and Epstein (198......