Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Savage,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 265 |
| Docket Number | CA45103 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 26 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...for any reason clearly expressed itself it has all the resources available to correct that inadequacy of expression. (See also Li v Rao, 2019 BCCA 265 at paras 83-84; Royal Crown Gold Reserve Inc v Schneider, 2012 SKCA 105 at para 17; and Bhatnager v Canada (Minister of Employment & Imm......
-
Mercredi v Saskatoon Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86
...for this argument. I conclude it is based on the doctrine of implied exclusion, which Savage J.A. succinctly described in Li v Rao, 2019 BCCA 265: [74] The doctrine of implied exclusion, or expressio unius est exclusio alterius, is a maxim of statutory interpretation that provides that the ......
-
C.K.M. v. H.R.M.,
...cases before them from those in Biedler and Pigeon, they have endeavoured to do so: Re Thompson; Re Beninger; Taylor. [212] In Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265, the court described some of the stages in the development of BC’s FLA. [26] In 2002, the Attorney General formed a task force composed of ......
-
Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 264
...marital relationship are more fully described in the reasons for judgment released concurrently with this appeal, indexed as Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265. [3] The chambers judge granted an injunction enjoining Mr. Rao from proceeding with the foreign arbitration until various applications in th......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...for any reason clearly expressed itself it has all the resources available to correct that inadequacy of expression. (See also Li v Rao, 2019 BCCA 265 at paras 83-84; Royal Crown Gold Reserve Inc v Schneider, 2012 SKCA 105 at para 17; and Bhatnager v Canada (Minister of Employment & Imm......
-
Mercredi v Saskatoon Provincial Correctional Centre, 2019 SKCA 86
...for this argument. I conclude it is based on the doctrine of implied exclusion, which Savage J.A. succinctly described in Li v Rao, 2019 BCCA 265: [74] The doctrine of implied exclusion, or expressio unius est exclusio alterius, is a maxim of statutory interpretation that provides that the ......
-
C.K.M. v. H.R.M.,
...cases before them from those in Biedler and Pigeon, they have endeavoured to do so: Re Thompson; Re Beninger; Taylor. [212] In Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265, the court described some of the stages in the development of BC’s FLA. [26] In 2002, the Attorney General formed a task force composed of ......
-
Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 264
...marital relationship are more fully described in the reasons for judgment released concurrently with this appeal, indexed as Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265. [3] The chambers judge granted an injunction enjoining Mr. Rao from proceeding with the foreign arbitration until various applications in th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Exceptional Circumstances: British Columbia Court Of Appeal Upholds Anti-Arbitration Injunction On Contractual Grounds
...on a breach of contract, i.e. on a party's own conduct".5 Footnote [1]Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 264. [2]Li v. Rao, 2018 BCSC 47. [3]Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 265. [4]Li v. Rao, 2018 BCSC [5] At para 73. To view the original article click here The content of this article is intended to provide a gener......