Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163 (SC)
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Silverman, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | DAMAGES,EQUITY,TORTS,FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,CONTRACTS |
Citation | [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163 (SC),[2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163,2006 BCSC 344 |
Date | 02 March 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...v Sayers, [1970] OJ No 1577 (Dist Ct)....................................................329, 353–54 Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc, 2006 BCSC 344 ..........................................1, 9, 78–81 Lifestyles Kitchens & Bath, a division of GVBS Inc v Danbury Sales Inc, [1999] OJ No 3097......
-
Introduction to Bailment Law: The Nature and Elements of Bailment and Bailment Distinguished from Other Heads of Obligation
...be found, legal ownership must be retained by the bailor, with only possession passing to the bailee: Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc , 2006 BCSC 344 [ Lichti ]. 2 Seaspan International Ltd v “Kostis Prois” (The) , [1974] SCR 920 at para 10 [paragraph numbers rom French version] [ Seaspan I......
-
Sun v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corporation,
...dismissed because Mercedes took reasonable care in the unusual circumstances of this repossession: see Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc., 2006 BCSC 344 at paras. 64‑65. Mercedes tried to contact the plaintiffs at the number in the lease. It had a professional bailiff collect the car ......
1 cases
-
Sun v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corporation,
...dismissed because Mercedes took reasonable care in the unusual circumstances of this repossession: see Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc., 2006 BCSC 344 at paras. 64‑65. Mercedes tried to contact the plaintiffs at the number in the lease. It had a professional bailiff collect the car ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Sayers, [1970] OJ No 1577 (Dist Ct)....................................................329, 353–54 Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc, 2006 BCSC 344 ..........................................1, 9, 78–81 Lifestyles Kitchens & Bath, a division of GVBS Inc v Danbury Sales Inc, [1999] OJ No 3097......
-
Introduction to Bailment Law: The Nature and Elements of Bailment and Bailment Distinguished from Other Heads of Obligation
...be found, legal ownership must be retained by the bailor, with only possession passing to the bailee: Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc , 2006 BCSC 344 [ Lichti ]. 2 Seaspan International Ltd v “Kostis Prois” (The) , [1974] SCR 920 at para 10 [paragraph numbers rom French version] [ Seaspan I......