Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSilverman, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,EQUITY,TORTS,FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,CONTRACTS
Citation[2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163 (SC),[2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 163,2006 BCSC 344
Date02 March 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Bailment
    • June 25, 2019
    ...v Sayers, [1970] OJ No 1577 (Dist Ct)....................................................329, 353–54 Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc, 2006 BCSC 344 ..........................................1, 9, 78–81 Lifestyles Kitchens & Bath, a division of GVBS Inc v Danbury Sales Inc, [1999] OJ No 3097......
  • Introduction to Bailment Law: The Nature and Elements of Bailment and Bailment Distinguished from Other Heads of Obligation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Bailment
    • June 25, 2019
    ...be found, legal ownership must be retained by the bailor, with only possession passing to the bailee: Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc , 2006 BCSC 344 [ Lichti ]. 2 Seaspan International Ltd v “Kostis Prois” (The) , [1974] SCR 920 at para 10 [paragraph numbers rom French version] [ Seaspan I......
  • Sun v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 10, 2022
    ...dismissed because Mercedes took reasonable care in the unusual circumstances of this repossession: see Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc., 2006 BCSC 344 at paras. 64‑65. Mercedes tried to contact the plaintiffs at the number in the lease. It had a professional bailiff collect the car ......
1 cases
  • Sun v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 10, 2022
    ...dismissed because Mercedes took reasonable care in the unusual circumstances of this repossession: see Lichti v. Landmark Transport Inc., 2006 BCSC 344 at paras. 64‑65. Mercedes tried to contact the plaintiffs at the number in the lease. It had a professional bailiff collect the car ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Bailment
    • June 25, 2019
    ...v Sayers, [1970] OJ No 1577 (Dist Ct)....................................................329, 353–54 Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc, 2006 BCSC 344 ..........................................1, 9, 78–81 Lifestyles Kitchens & Bath, a division of GVBS Inc v Danbury Sales Inc, [1999] OJ No 3097......
  • Introduction to Bailment Law: The Nature and Elements of Bailment and Bailment Distinguished from Other Heads of Obligation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Bailment
    • June 25, 2019
    ...be found, legal ownership must be retained by the bailor, with only possession passing to the bailee: Lichti v Landmark Transport Inc , 2006 BCSC 344 [ Lichti ]. 2 Seaspan International Ltd v “Kostis Prois” (The) , [1974] SCR 920 at para 10 [paragraph numbers rom French version] [ Seaspan I......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT