Liu v. Zhao,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeStephens
Citation2022 BCSC 1991
Docket NumberE212970
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date15 November 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Linke v McCullough,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Mayo 2023
    ...through discovery and/or disclosure. As a result, I did not hear evidence with respect to the Indian property. 144 In Liu v Zhao, 2022 BCSC 1991, the Court said at para 17: … While Canadian courts will not adjudicate a right, title, or interest to immovable property in a foreign coun......
  • 2023 BCSC 1112,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...do in this case. 29 However, for applications brought under R. 18–2(2) of the Supreme Court Family Rules, the court in Liu v. Zhao 2022 BCSC 1991 (“ Liu”), at para. 27, citing D.L. v. M.Y. 2019 BCSC 881 (“ D.L.”) at paras. 27–28, confirmed that the ......
  • Zeng v Kang,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2023
    ...do in this case. 29 However, for applications brought under R. 18–2(2) of the Supreme Court Family Rules, the court in Liu v. Zhao 2022 BCSC 1991 (“ Liu”), at para. 27, citing D.L. v. M.Y. 2019 BCSC 881 (“ D.L.”) at paras. 27–28, confirmed that the ......
3 cases
  • Linke v McCullough,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Mayo 2023
    ...through discovery and/or disclosure. As a result, I did not hear evidence with respect to the Indian property. 144 In Liu v Zhao, 2022 BCSC 1991, the Court said at para 17: … While Canadian courts will not adjudicate a right, title, or interest to immovable property in a foreign coun......
  • 2023 BCSC 1112,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...do in this case. 29 However, for applications brought under R. 18–2(2) of the Supreme Court Family Rules, the court in Liu v. Zhao 2022 BCSC 1991 (“ Liu”), at para. 27, citing D.L. v. M.Y. 2019 BCSC 881 (“ D.L.”) at paras. 27–28, confirmed that the ......
  • Zeng v Kang,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2023
    ...do in this case. 29 However, for applications brought under R. 18–2(2) of the Supreme Court Family Rules, the court in Liu v. Zhao 2022 BCSC 1991 (“ Liu”), at para. 27, citing D.L. v. M.Y. 2019 BCSC 881 (“ D.L.”) at paras. 27–28, confirmed that the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT