Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2019 FC 1434
Date14 November 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2021 FC 186
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...Dow, above, at paras 17 and 21; Seedlings, above, at para 6; Bauer, above, at para 13. See also Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 at para 15. In approaching this assessment, it should be kept in mind that determining the level of a lump sum award “is not an exact......
  • Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 505
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...cases: Packers Plus Energy Services Inc v Essential Energy Services Ltd, 2020 FC 68 (40%); Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Corporation, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws] (25%); Sport Maska (33%); Shire (30%); Nova Chemicals Corporation v The Dow Chemical Company, 2016 FC 91, aff’d 2017 FCA 25 (30%); ......
  • Zara Natural Stones Inc. v. Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...Nova Chemicals Corporation v. Dow Chemical Company, 2017 FCA 25 [Nova], at paragraph 17; and Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws], at paragraph 16. The aforementioned jurisprudence support the premise that intellectual property proceedings “with sophisti......
  • NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 7, 2023
    ...Rennie held that for these kinds of complex cases the range should be between 25% and 50%. Loblaws Inc v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws]: The crux of Loblaws was a series of causes of action under the Trade-marks Act. Chief Justice Crampton specifically cites paragraph 1......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2021 FC 186
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...Dow, above, at paras 17 and 21; Seedlings, above, at para 6; Bauer, above, at para 13. See also Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 at para 15. In approaching this assessment, it should be kept in mind that determining the level of a lump sum award “is not an exact......
  • Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 505
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...cases: Packers Plus Energy Services Inc v Essential Energy Services Ltd, 2020 FC 68 (40%); Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Corporation, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws] (25%); Sport Maska (33%); Shire (30%); Nova Chemicals Corporation v The Dow Chemical Company, 2016 FC 91, aff’d 2017 FCA 25 (30%); ......
  • Zara Natural Stones Inc. v. Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...Nova Chemicals Corporation v. Dow Chemical Company, 2017 FCA 25 [Nova], at paragraph 17; and Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws], at paragraph 16. The aforementioned jurisprudence support the premise that intellectual property proceedings “with sophisti......
  • NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 7, 2023
    ...Rennie held that for these kinds of complex cases the range should be between 25% and 50%. Loblaws Inc v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434 [Loblaws]: The crux of Loblaws was a series of causes of action under the Trade-marks Act. Chief Justice Crampton specifically cites paragraph 1......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT