Loh (C.Y.) Associates Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.) et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Wong, J. |
| Citation | 2, 5 And 7,[1991] B.C.T.C. Uned. C84 |
| Date | 27 September 1991 |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,STATUTES,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
52 practice notes
-
Ancillary Orders
...person subject to a SOIRA order may apply to have it terminated after 5 years for ofences prosecuted summarily or punishable by a maximum of 2 or 5 years, after 10 years if the maximum penalty for the ofence is 10 or 14 years, or 20 years if the maximum penalty is life.54 Regardless of the ......
-
Rodaro v. Royal Bk.
...under the interest capitalization facility. The plaintiffs could not meet the predisbursement conditions for further draws under Segments 2 or 5, and did not submit any further draw requests. There was nothing to "shut down" under the May 1989 Letter Agreement. [545] What the plai......
-
Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
...the low success rate of PRRAs is an objective indicator of a certain degree of misuse of the PRRA process. The success rate, whether it be 2 or 5 percent, is low by any acceptable measure of an adjudicative process that is intended to serve a practical purpose. For the large majority of uns......
-
Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
...or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 332 ANNOTATED ONTARIO MENTAL HEALTH STATUTES 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the definition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is au......
Get Started for Free
47 cases
-
Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
...the low success rate of PRRAs is an objective indicator of a certain degree of misuse of the PRRA process. The success rate, whether it be 2 or 5 percent, is low by any acceptable measure of an adjudicative process that is intended to serve a practical purpose. For the large majority of uns......
-
Rodaro v. Royal Bk.
...under the interest capitalization facility. The plaintiffs could not meet the predisbursement conditions for further draws under Segments 2 or 5, and did not submit any further draw requests. There was nothing to "shut down" under the May 1989 Letter Agreement. [545] What the plaintiffs rea......
-
Merck & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc.
...interlocutory motion in this matter as reported at (2003) 30 C.P.R.(4th) 40; 2003 FCA 488, at paragraph 2. [128] Thus, if any of claims 1, 2 or 5 is valid, Apotex will have infringed such claims subject to the exemptions put in issue. Claim 5 is directed to formulated drugs thus, only Apote......
-
Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Jamp Pharma Corporation
...comprising a capsule shell and a capsule formulation, wherein the capsule formulation comprises the formulation in accordance with claim [2 or 5].] 8. Capsule according to claim 7, wherein the capsule is a soft gelatin 22. Glass container or flexible/hard plastic container suitable for the ......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Ancillary Orders
...person subject to a SOIRA order may apply to have it terminated after 5 years for ofences prosecuted summarily or punishable by a maximum of 2 or 5 years, after 10 years if the maximum penalty for the ofence is 10 or 14 years, or 20 years if the maximum penalty is life.54 Regardless of the ......
-
Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
...or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 332 ANNOTATED ONTARIO MENTAL HEALTH STATUTES 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the definition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is au......
-
Appendix 4: Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
...while performing the person’s powers or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the definition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is authorized ......
32 provisions
-
Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004, S.O. 2004, c. 3, Sched. A 0
...while performing the person’s powers or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the definition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information Note: On a day to be named by proclamatio......
-
Part II, Vol. 151, No. 4
...Regulations31 is replaced by the following: (a) multiples or submultiples of the kilogram, gram or milligram having values equal to 1, 2 or 5 × 10n where “n” represents a whole number, whether posi- tive, negative or equal to zero; 2 (1) The definition electronic machine in sec- tion 150 of......
-
BUILDING CODE, O. Reg. 332/12
...Precoated, Factory-Finished, for Exterior Cladding”. (2) Hardboard cladding that is not factory finished shall conform to Types 1, 2 or 5 in CAN/CGSB-11.3-M, 9.27.9.2. Thickness (1) Type 1 or 2 hardboard cladding shall be not less than, (a) 6.0 mm thick when applied over sheathing that prov......
-
GRANTS FOR STUDENT NEEDS - LEGISLATIVE GRANTS FOR THE 2016-2017 SCHOOL BOARD FISCAL YEAR, O. Reg. 215/16
...board to administration and governance. (3) If a report described in subsection 16 (2) indicates that the board failed to comply with section 2 or 5 of Ontario Regulation 132/12 (Class Size) made under the Act in both of the two fiscal years preceding the current fiscal year, the amount of ......
Get Started for Free
