Loh (C.Y.) Associates Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.) et al., 2 5 And 7

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWong, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCOURTS,STATUTES,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Citation2, 5 And 7,[1991] B.C.T.C. Uned. C84
Date27 September 1991
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 practice notes
  • Rodaro v. Royal Bk., [2000] O.T.C. 85 (SupCt)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 14, 1998
    ...under the interest capitalization facility. The plaintiffs could not meet the predisbursement conditions for further draws under Segments 2 or 5, and did not submit any further draw requests. There was nothing to "shut down" under the May 1989 Letter Agreement. [545] What the plai......
  • Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), (2014) 467 F.T.R. 169 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 3, 2013
    ...the low success rate of PRRAs is an objective indicator of a certain degree of misuse of the PRRA process. The success rate, whether it be 2 or 5 percent, is low by any acceptable measure of an adjudicative process that is intended to serve a practical purpose. For the large majority of uns......
  • Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes: Fourth Edition
    • June 15, 2007
    ...or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 332 ANNOTATED ONTARIO MENTAL HEALTH STATUTES 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the def‌inition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is au......
  • Canadian Frontline Nurses v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 42
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2024
    ...prohibitions contained at sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 of the Regulations violated sections 2(b)(c)(d) and 7 of the Charter, and whether sections 2 or 5 of the Economic Order infringed section 8 of the Charter; -If so, whether the infringed rights, if any, can be justified under section 1 of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
42 cases
  • Rodaro v. Royal Bk., [2000] O.T.C. 85 (SupCt)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 14, 1998
    ...under the interest capitalization facility. The plaintiffs could not meet the predisbursement conditions for further draws under Segments 2 or 5, and did not submit any further draw requests. There was nothing to "shut down" under the May 1989 Letter Agreement. [545] What the plai......
  • Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), (2014) 467 F.T.R. 169 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 3, 2013
    ...the low success rate of PRRAs is an objective indicator of a certain degree of misuse of the PRRA process. The success rate, whether it be 2 or 5 percent, is low by any acceptable measure of an adjudicative process that is intended to serve a practical purpose. For the large majority of uns......
  • Canadian Frontline Nurses v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2024
    ...prohibitions contained at sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 of the Regulations violated sections 2(b)(c)(d) and 7 of the Charter, and whether sections 2 or 5 of the Economic Order infringed section 8 of the Charter; -If so, whether the infringed rights, if any, can be justified under section 1 of the......
  • Merck & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc., (2006) 282 F.T.R. 161 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 26, 2006
    ...interlocutory motion in this matter as reported at (2003) 30 C.P.R.(4th) 40; 2003 FCA 488, at paragraph 2. [128] Thus, if any of claims 1, 2 or 5 is valid, Apotex will have infringed such claims subject to the exemptions put in issue. Claim 5 is directed to formulated drugs thus, only Apote......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Ancillary Orders
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...person subject to a SOIRA order may apply to have it terminated after 5 years for ofences prosecuted summarily or punishable by a maximum of 2 or 5 years, after 10 years if the maximum penalty for the ofence is 10 or 14 years, or 20 years if the maximum penalty is life.54 Regardless of the ......
  • Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes: Fourth Edition
    • June 15, 2007
    ...or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 332 ANNOTATED ONTARIO MENTAL HEALTH STATUTES 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the def‌inition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is au......
  • Appendix 4: Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Ontario Personal Health Information Protection Act. A Practical Guide for Health Care Providers
    • June 17, 2005
    ...while performing the person’s powers or duties or the work described in the paragraph, if any: 1. A person described in paragraph 1, 2 or 5 of the definition of “health information custodian” in subsection (1) who is an agent of a health information custodian. 2. A person who is authorized ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT