Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education) et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 413 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHinkson, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE
Citation[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 413 (SC),2015 BCSC 413,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 413
Date18 March 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 25, 2021
    ...The first criterion in the Carter test was discussed in Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413 at para. 83, where the Court observed [83]      [u]nder the Carter test the petitioner must also ......
  • Independent Contractors and Businesses Association v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 291
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 6, 2019
    ...merits, although the Court nevertheless declined to decide the appeal. [44] In Loke v. British Columbia (Minster of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413, Chief Justice Hinkson found that the adversarial context requirement was not met where the underlying dispute was resolved before the case ......
  • Superintendent of Real Estate v. Real Estate Council of B.C., 2018 BCSC 2087
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 26, 2018
    ...arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 12]     Closer to the mark is Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413.  That case involved a challenge to the Minister's conditional consent to the establishment of a law school at Trinity Western Universit......
  • Douglas Lake Cattle Company v. Nicola Valley Fish and Game Club, 2019 BCSC 1217
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 5, 2019
    ...decision such as today. As Chief Justice Hinkson noted this in the case of Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413, despite the fact that the litigant was a personal litigant, the Court still found them, at a costs hearing, to be public interest [8] It is im......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 25, 2021
    ...The first criterion in the Carter test was discussed in Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413 at para. 83, where the Court observed [83]      [u]nder the Carter test the petitioner must also ......
  • Independent Contractors and Businesses Association v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 291
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 6, 2019
    ...merits, although the Court nevertheless declined to decide the appeal. [44] In Loke v. British Columbia (Minster of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413, Chief Justice Hinkson found that the adversarial context requirement was not met where the underlying dispute was resolved before the case ......
  • Superintendent of Real Estate v. Real Estate Council of B.C., 2018 BCSC 2087
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 26, 2018
    ...arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 12]     Closer to the mark is Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413.  That case involved a challenge to the Minister's conditional consent to the establishment of a law school at Trinity Western Universit......
  • Douglas Lake Cattle Company v. Nicola Valley Fish and Game Club, 2019 BCSC 1217
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 5, 2019
    ...decision such as today. As Chief Justice Hinkson noted this in the case of Loke v. British Columbia (Minister of Advanced Education), 2015 BCSC 413, despite the fact that the litigant was a personal litigant, the Court still found them, at a costs hearing, to be public interest [8] It is im......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT