Lubega-Matovu v. Canada, 2016 FCA 315
| Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Case Date | December 16, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FCA 315 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Semenov v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 58
...Petro-Canada v The Queen, 2004 FCA 158, ¶24, 65 & 68; Anonby v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 184, ¶28-30; Lubega-Matovu v The Queen, 2016 FCA 315, ¶26; and Murji v The Queen, 2018 TCC 7, ¶65. [17] Exhibit A-1, Tab 3, p. 3/5. [18] Exhibit A-1, Tab 3, p. 4/5. [19]......
-
Landbouwbedrijf Backx B.V. v. Canada, 2019 FCA 310
...and overriding error for questions of fact or mixed fact and law and correctness for questions of law (see also Lubega-Matovu v. Canada, 2016 FCA 315, at paragraph 12). [4] I will now consider the appellant’s three arguments. II. Did the TCC misapply the common law test for determining resi......
2 cases
-
Semenov v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 58
...Petro-Canada v The Queen, 2004 FCA 158, ¶24, 65 & 68; Anonby v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 184, ¶28-30; Lubega-Matovu v The Queen, 2016 FCA 315, ¶26; and Murji v The Queen, 2018 TCC 7, ¶65. [17] Exhibit A-1, Tab 3, p. 3/5. [18] Exhibit A-1, Tab 3, p. 4/5. [19]......
-
Landbouwbedrijf Backx B.V. v. Canada, 2019 FCA 310
...and overriding error for questions of fact or mixed fact and law and correctness for questions of law (see also Lubega-Matovu v. Canada, 2016 FCA 315, at paragraph 12). [4] I will now consider the appellant’s three arguments. II. Did the TCC misapply the common law test for determining resi......