Lukács v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 10 December 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 FC 1142 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Najm v. Canada (Indigenous Services), 2023 FC 744
...requested should be disclosed to the requester: Preventous at para 13; Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44; Lambert v Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553 at para [44] The second is said to be a decision by the Information Commissioner......
-
Lambert v. Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553
...although that decision triggers the ability to seek review: ATIA, s 41; Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44. IV. Analysis A. The Court has jurisdiction to hear the application [23] The Minister argues this Court has no jurisdiction to entertai......
-
Savoie v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 333
...it triggers the applicant’s right to seek a review by this Court (Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44). Rather, it is a review of the RCMP’s Decision to withhold the records. [34] Section 44.1 of the Act, entitled “De......
-
Ali v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2024 FC 63
...seek judicial review, the decision of the OIC is not subject to review: Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 [Lukács] at paras 8 and 44. The role of the Court instead is to determine whether the original decision-maker correctly applied the exem......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Najm v. Canada (Indigenous Services), 2023 FC 744
...requested should be disclosed to the requester: Preventous at para 13; Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44; Lambert v Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553 at para [44] The second is said to be a decision by the Information Commissioner......
-
Lambert v. Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2022 FC 553
...although that decision triggers the ability to seek review: ATIA, s 41; Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44. IV. Analysis A. The Court has jurisdiction to hear the application [23] The Minister argues this Court has no jurisdiction to entertai......
-
Savoie v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 333
...it triggers the applicant’s right to seek a review by this Court (Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 at para 44). Rather, it is a review of the RCMP’s Decision to withhold the records. [34] Section 44.1 of the Act, entitled “De......
-
Ali v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2024 FC 63
...seek judicial review, the decision of the OIC is not subject to review: Lukács v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 1142 [Lukács] at paras 8 and 44. The role of the Court instead is to determine whether the original decision-maker correctly applied the exem......
Request a trial to view additional results