Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797

Judgment Cited authorities 44 Cited in 3 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 797
Date28 July 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Stuckless v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...a reviewable error by referring to the decisions in Wojcik v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 958; Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797; and Henri v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1141, to find that the degree of procedural fairness owed to Mr. Stuckless in this case was lo......
  • Stuckless v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1062
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 12, 2021
    ...entitlement to sell cannabis, and therefore of his individual right, privilege and interest. I agree. In Lum v. Canada (Attorney General) 2020 FC 797 [Lum], Justice Cecily Strickland concluded that the Director General had a duty of procedural fairness towards applicants for a security clea......
  • Wojcik v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 958
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 8, 2020
    ...the deficiencies, that was part of the record before the Director. [35]  Justice Strickland in Lum v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797 [Lum] – the only decision to date on security clearance in respect of cannabis licensees - performed a thorough analysis of the scheme for ......
3 cases
  • Stuckless v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...a reviewable error by referring to the decisions in Wojcik v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 958; Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797; and Henri v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1141, to find that the degree of procedural fairness owed to Mr. Stuckless in this case was lo......
  • Stuckless v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1062
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 12, 2021
    ...entitlement to sell cannabis, and therefore of his individual right, privilege and interest. I agree. In Lum v. Canada (Attorney General) 2020 FC 797 [Lum], Justice Cecily Strickland concluded that the Director General had a duty of procedural fairness towards applicants for a security clea......
  • Wojcik v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 958
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 8, 2020
    ...the deficiencies, that was part of the record before the Director. [35]  Justice Strickland in Lum v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797 [Lum] – the only decision to date on security clearance in respect of cannabis licensees - performed a thorough analysis of the scheme for ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT