Lusted v. Bogobowicz,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice L. Madsen |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONSC 269 |
| Date | 13 January 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 ONSC 269 |
| Docket Number | FC-19-FS000044-0000 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Fatima v Agha,
...versus a final order. Interim orders are most commonly varied only in “compelling” or “exceptional” circumstances: Lusted v. Bogobowicz, 2021 ONSC 269 20 In Thom v. Thom, [2014] O.J. No. 2115, the court stated, “Given that interim Orders are ‘meant to provide a reasonable acceptable solutio......
1 cases
-
Fatima v Agha,
...versus a final order. Interim orders are most commonly varied only in “compelling” or “exceptional” circumstances: Lusted v. Bogobowicz, 2021 ONSC 269 20 In Thom v. Thom, [2014] O.J. No. 2115, the court stated, “Given that interim Orders are ‘meant to provide a reasonable acceptable solutio......