Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeG.P. Weatherill
Citation2018 BCSC 2144
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date04 December 2018
Docket NumberS168275
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Walls v. Ocampo, 2020 BCSC 499
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 d3 Abril d3 2020
    ...objective one. The question is whether the plaintiff made contextually reasonable and sincere efforts to limit the loss: Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, at para. [148] It is appropriate to consider the issue of mitigation separately in respect of each head of damage: Zawadzki v. Calimoso 2......
  • Hadley v. Pabla, 2021 BCSC 238
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d2 Fevereiro d2 2021
    ...objective one. The question is whether the plaintiff made contextually reasonable and sincere efforts to limit the loss: Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, at para. [148] It is appropriate to consider the issue of mitigation separately in respect of each head of damage: Zawadzki v. Calimoso 2......
  • Naiodro v. Gill, 2019 BCSC 1857
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 d4 Outubro d4 2019
    ...should result in a 20% reduction of her total award for damages. [146] The plaintiff cites several principles from Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144 at para. 51. Here, Justice Weatherill held a) the reasonableness standard the plaintiff must meet is not one of perfection; b) losses that could......
  • Ueland v. Lynch, 2019 BCCA 431
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 28 d4 Novembro d4 2019
    ...Mr. Justice Hunter On appeal from:  An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated December 4, 2018 (Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, New Westminster Docket S168275). Counsel for the C.P. Dennis, Q.C. E.J.S. Aitken Counsel for the Respondent: J.S. Stanley S. Gibson Place......
4 cases
  • Walls v. Ocampo, 2020 BCSC 499
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 d3 Abril d3 2020
    ...objective one. The question is whether the plaintiff made contextually reasonable and sincere efforts to limit the loss: Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, at para. [148] It is appropriate to consider the issue of mitigation separately in respect of each head of damage: Zawadzki v. Calimoso 2......
  • Hadley v. Pabla, 2021 BCSC 238
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d2 Fevereiro d2 2021
    ...objective one. The question is whether the plaintiff made contextually reasonable and sincere efforts to limit the loss: Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, at para. [148] It is appropriate to consider the issue of mitigation separately in respect of each head of damage: Zawadzki v. Calimoso 2......
  • Naiodro v. Gill, 2019 BCSC 1857
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 d4 Outubro d4 2019
    ...should result in a 20% reduction of her total award for damages. [146] The plaintiff cites several principles from Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144 at para. 51. Here, Justice Weatherill held a) the reasonableness standard the plaintiff must meet is not one of perfection; b) losses that could......
  • Ueland v. Lynch, 2019 BCCA 431
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 28 d4 Novembro d4 2019
    ...Mr. Justice Hunter On appeal from:  An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated December 4, 2018 (Lynch v. Ueland, 2018 BCSC 2144, New Westminster Docket S168275). Counsel for the C.P. Dennis, Q.C. E.J.S. Aitken Counsel for the Respondent: J.S. Stanley S. Gibson Place......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT