M.A.B. v. M.G.C.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Chappel |
| Citation | 2022 ONSC 7207 |
| Date | 22 December 2022 |
| Docket Number | FC 1728/17 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
94 practice notes
-
K.M. v. J.R.
...which existed at the time. Gordon v. Goertz (1996) 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC); Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (SCC); M.A.B. v. M.G.C. 2022 ONSC 7207 b. The onus is on the person seeking to change the existing order to prove on a balance of probabilities that there is a material change tha......
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...to the date of the formal application): DBS v SRG, 2006 SCC 37 at paras 2 and 69-70; Kerr at para 206; Harbaugh CA at para 31; MAB v MGC, 2022 ONSC 7207 at para 449; AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189 at para 196. [154] In recent years, the framework for assessing retroactive child support claims, ori......
-
R.M. v. D.S.
...CanLII 191 (SCC); Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (SCC); M.A.B. v. M.G.C. 2022 ONSC 7207 (SCJ). b. The onus is on the person seeking to change the existing order to prove on a balance of probabilities that there is a material c......
-
Khan v. Khan
...[7] I turn first to the law respecting the assessment of credibility and reliability, which I reviewed in detail in M.A.B. v. M.G.C., 2022 ONSC 7207 (S.C.J.), at paras. 48 to 49. The concepts of credibility and reliability are related but distinct. Shergill J. provided an excellent descript......
Get Started for Free
94 cases
-
K.M. v. J.R.
...which existed at the time. Gordon v. Goertz (1996) 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC); Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (SCC); M.A.B. v. M.G.C. 2022 ONSC 7207 b. The onus is on the person seeking to change the existing order to prove on a balance of probabilities that there is a material change tha......
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...to the date of the formal application): DBS v SRG, 2006 SCC 37 at paras 2 and 69-70; Kerr at para 206; Harbaugh CA at para 31; MAB v MGC, 2022 ONSC 7207 at para 449; AE v AE, 2021 ONSC 8189 at para 196. [154] In recent years, the framework for assessing retroactive child support claims, ori......
-
R.M. v. D.S.
...CanLII 191 (SCC); Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (SCC); M.A.B. v. M.G.C. 2022 ONSC 7207 (SCJ). b. The onus is on the person seeking to change the existing order to prove on a balance of probabilities that there is a material c......
-
Khan v. Khan
...[7] I turn first to the law respecting the assessment of credibility and reliability, which I reviewed in detail in M.A.B. v. M.G.C., 2022 ONSC 7207 (S.C.J.), at paras. 48 to 49. The concepts of credibility and reliability are related but distinct. Shergill J. provided an excellent descript......
Get Started for Free
