M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock |
Citation | 2020 BCCA 284 |
Date | 23 October 2020 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Docket Number | CA46083 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...138. See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazaratz J. 264 2015 ABQB 6 at para 50; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284 at para 19; JMG v LDG, 2016 ONSC 3042; KR v JK, 2018 SKCA 265 Johal v Johal, [2009] BCJ No 1874 (CA). 266 Batsinda v Batsinda, 2013 ONSC 7869 ......
-
Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...873. 168 [1993] BCJ No 1049 at para 33 (SC); see also IJGPG v KM, 2016 BCSC 1072 at para 100; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284; CMC v JCP, 2020 BCSC Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation the court. In the truest sense these indiv......
-
The Crises of Marriage Breakdown and Processes for Dealing with Them
...v ALES, 2019 BCSC 419 at para 38; but see FJV v WKS, 2019 BCCA 67 at para 40; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685 at paras 130–35; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284. 2020 BCCA 284 at para 28. See also TR v AR, 2020 BCSC Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC 328; Jirova v Benincasa, 2018 ONSC 534. Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC......
-
R.J. v. P.J.,
...in his reasons, and I would not give effect to this complaint. Recently, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia in M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1640 (QL), had occasion to review this principle in a high-conflict divorce where child custody was at stake. It is fair to......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R.J. v. P.J.,
...in his reasons, and I would not give effect to this complaint. Recently, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia in M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1640 (QL), had occasion to review this principle in a high-conflict divorce where child custody was at stake. It is fair to......
-
M.S.R. v. D.M.R.,
...s. 211 report: while the court is not bound by the findings of such a report (A.R. v. A.V.R., 2016 BCSC 629 at para. 4; M.F.W. v. M.F.W., 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 25), the facts set out in a s. 211 report are prima facie evidence of the truth of those facts: A.P. v. J. C., 2018 BCSC 1381 at p......
-
M.F.W. v. M.A.H.,
...father’s mother when he was a child.” The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge did not err: M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 42. [49] I am not satisfied that any income should be imputed to Ms. W. The trial decision......
-
S.T. v A.T.,
...assessment based on the evidence at trial and come to a conclusion as to what is in the best interests of the child: M.F.W. v. M.A.H, 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 36 Dr. Krywaniuk prepared the s. 211 report (the “Krywaniuk Report”). Dr. Krywaniuk is an experienced registered psychol......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...138. See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazaratz J. 264 2015 ABQB 6 at para 50; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284 at para 19; JMG v LDG, 2016 ONSC 3042; KR v JK, 2018 SKCA 265 Johal v Johal, [2009] BCJ No 1874 (CA). 266 Batsinda v Batsinda, 2013 ONSC 7869 ......
-
Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
...873. 168 [1993] BCJ No 1049 at para 33 (SC); see also IJGPG v KM, 2016 BCSC 1072 at para 100; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284; CMC v JCP, 2020 BCSC Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation the court. In the truest sense these indiv......
-
The Crises of Marriage Breakdown and Processes for Dealing with Them
...v ALES, 2019 BCSC 419 at para 38; but see FJV v WKS, 2019 BCCA 67 at para 40; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685 at paras 130–35; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284. 2020 BCCA 284 at para 28. See also TR v AR, 2020 BCSC Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC 328; Jirova v Benincasa, 2018 ONSC 534. Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC......