M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock
Citation2020 BCCA 284
Date23 October 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA46083
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...138. See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazaratz J. 264 2015 ABQB 6 at para 50; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284 at para 19; JMG v LDG, 2016 ONSC 3042; KR v JK, 2018 SKCA 265 Johal v Johal, [2009] BCJ No 1874 (CA). 266 Batsinda v Batsinda, 2013 ONSC 7869 ......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...873. 168 [1993] BCJ No 1049 at para 33 (SC); see also IJGPG v KM, 2016 BCSC 1072 at para 100; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284; CMC v JCP, 2020 BCSC Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation the court. In the truest sense these indiv......
  • The Crises of Marriage Breakdown and Processes for Dealing with Them
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v ALES, 2019 BCSC 419 at para 38; but see FJV v WKS, 2019 BCCA 67 at para 40; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685 at paras 130–35; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284. 2020 BCCA 284 at para 28. See also TR v AR, 2020 BCSC Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC 328; Jirova v Benincasa, 2018 ONSC 534. Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC......
  • R.J. v. P.J.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • May 27, 2021
    ...in his reasons, and I would not give effect to this complaint. Recently, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia in M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1640 (QL), had occasion to review this principle in a high-conflict divorce where child custody was at stake. It is fair to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • R.J. v. P.J.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • May 27, 2021
    ...in his reasons, and I would not give effect to this complaint. Recently, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia in M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1640 (QL), had occasion to review this principle in a high-conflict divorce where child custody was at stake. It is fair to......
  • M.S.R. v. D.M.R.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...s. 211 report: while the court is not bound by the findings of such a report (A.R. v. A.V.R., 2016 BCSC 629 at para. 4; M.F.W. v. M.F.W., 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 25), the facts set out in a s. 211 report are prima facie evidence of the truth of those facts: A.P. v. J. C., 2018 BCSC 1381 at p......
  • M.F.W. v. M.A.H.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...father’s mother when he was a child.” The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge did not err:  M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 42. [49]        I am not satisfied that any income should be imputed to Ms. W. The trial decision......
  • S.T. v A.T.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...assessment based on the evidence at trial and come to a conclusion as to what is in the best interests of the child: M.F.W. v. M.A.H, 2020 BCCA 284 at para. 36 Dr. Krywaniuk prepared the s. 211 report (the “Krywaniuk Report”). Dr. Krywaniuk is an experienced registered psychol......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...138. See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazaratz J. 264 2015 ABQB 6 at para 50; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284 at para 19; JMG v LDG, 2016 ONSC 3042; KR v JK, 2018 SKCA 265 Johal v Johal, [2009] BCJ No 1874 (CA). 266 Batsinda v Batsinda, 2013 ONSC 7869 ......
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...873. 168 [1993] BCJ No 1049 at para 33 (SC); see also IJGPG v KM, 2016 BCSC 1072 at para 100; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284; CMC v JCP, 2020 BCSC Chapter 12: Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation the court. In the truest sense these indiv......
  • The Crises of Marriage Breakdown and Processes for Dealing with Them
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v ALES, 2019 BCSC 419 at para 38; but see FJV v WKS, 2019 BCCA 67 at para 40; Wickstrom v Ng, 2019 BCSC 1685 at paras 130–35; MFW v MAH, 2020 BCCA 284. 2020 BCCA 284 at para 28. See also TR v AR, 2020 BCSC Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC 328; Jirova v Benincasa, 2018 ONSC 534. Law v Cheng, 2017 BCSC......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT