M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2020 ONSC 3491
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Grace J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 3491 |
| Date | 04 June 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | FD408/18 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
I.S. v. T.C., 2020 ONSC 5411
...events were not fixed or deferred for future determination. The respondent relies on Family Law Rules r 24(10) and M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2020 ONSC 3491 in support of her position that those costs are not recoverable now. [19] The applicable FLRs are r 17 (18) and (18.1), and r 24 (10 and (11): ......
-
E.M. v. C.V.,
...may be made, for example where it has led to an exceedingly efficient trial and duplication of time is eliminated (M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2020 ONSC 3491). The matter must be extremely complicated for the court to find that there is a need for second counsel, and this is particularly so in family......
2 cases
-
I.S. v. T.C., 2020 ONSC 5411
...events were not fixed or deferred for future determination. The respondent relies on Family Law Rules r 24(10) and M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2020 ONSC 3491 in support of her position that those costs are not recoverable now. [19] The applicable FLRs are r 17 (18) and (18.1), and r 24 (10 and (11): ......
-
E.M. v. C.V., 2023 ONSC 1178
...may be made, for example where it has led to an exceedingly efficient trial and duplication of time is eliminated (M.P.M. v. A.L.M., 2020 ONSC 3491). The matter must be extremely complicated for the court to find that there is a need for second counsel, and this is particularly so in family......