O.M.S. v. E.J.S.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | MEGAW J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKQB 243 |
| Citation | 2021 SKQB 243 |
| Docket Number | DIV 625 of 2012 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 09 September 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...thirteenth birthday – be vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus contrary to her wishes and those of her mother: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243, 61 RFL (8th) 341 [ Chambers 2 The mother appeals from the Chambers Decision. Among her arguments is that the Chambers judge erred in finding ......
-
Butu v. Canada (Attorney General),
...38–39, 41; A.C. v. L.L., 2021 ONSC 6530 at para. 28; Saint-Phard v. Saint-Phard, 2021 ONSC 6910 at paras. 5, 7; O.M.S. v. E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243 at paras. [Emphasis added.] [97] The SST-AD reasonably found that Ms. Butu had not raised any ground for appeal that had a reasonable chance......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...judge ordered that the child be vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus against her wishes and those of her mother: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243, 61 RFL (8th) 341 [ Vaccination 5 The mother has separately appealed against these three decisions. In a judgment delivered concurrently with thes......
4 cases
-
Dorceus v Ontario et Al,
...at paras. 36, 64; R. v. Phuntsok, 2020 ONSC 2158, at para. 26. See also: R. v. Phuntsok, 2020 ONSC 2158, at para. 26; O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243, at para. 113; Parmar v Tribe Management Inc., 2022 BCSC 1675 at para. 108; Steiner v. Mazzotta, 2022 BCSC 827 at para. 5, citing Dyquiangco J......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...thirteenth birthday – be vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus contrary to her wishes and those of her mother: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243, 61 RFL (8th) 341 [ Chambers 2 The mother appeals from the Chambers Decision. Among her arguments is that the Chambers judge erred in finding ......
-
Butu v. Canada (Attorney General),
...38–39, 41; A.C. v. L.L., 2021 ONSC 6530 at para. 28; Saint-Phard v. Saint-Phard, 2021 ONSC 6910 at paras. 5, 7; O.M.S. v. E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243 at paras. [Emphasis added.] [97] The SST-AD reasonably found that Ms. Butu had not raised any ground for appeal that had a reasonable chance......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...judge ordered that the child be vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus against her wishes and those of her mother: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243, 61 RFL (8th) 341 [ Vaccination 5 The mother has separately appealed against these three decisions. In a judgment delivered concurrently with thes......