O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Barrington-Foote,Leurer,Whitmore |
| Citation | 2023 SKCA 8 |
| Docket Number | CACV3908 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 12 January 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Mosquito,
...judicial notice can be taken have been met. However, a cautious approach is in order. This Court canvassed this issue in O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8, which related to judicial notice as to the safety and efficacy of a Covid vaccine in a family law context: [33] Judicial notice “disp......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...O.M.S. Applicant/Appellant (Petitioner) and E.J.S. Respondent/Respondent (Respondent) 2023 SKCA 8 Whitmore, Leurer and Barrington-Foote JJ.A. Docket: CACV3908 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: Timothy Turple for the Appellant Jason Brunton for the Respondent The Court I. INTRODUCTIO......
-
J.N. v C.G.,
...treatment by Health Canada, the national body tasked with determining that treatment's safety and effectiveness. In O.M.S v. E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, at para. 48, writes that: [I]n a family dispute, it is both unnecessary and, in most cases, unhelpful, for......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...with these reasons, we have explained why the mother's appeal against the Vaccination Decision must be allowed: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8 [ CA Vaccination Decision]. These reasons explain why the mother's appeal against the Evidentiary Fiat and the Publication Ban Fiat must be ......
4 cases
-
R v Mosquito,
...judicial notice can be taken have been met. However, a cautious approach is in order. This Court canvassed this issue in O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8, which related to judicial notice as to the safety and efficacy of a Covid vaccine in a family law context: [33] Judicial notice “disp......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...O.M.S. Applicant/Appellant (Petitioner) and E.J.S. Respondent/Respondent (Respondent) 2023 SKCA 8 Whitmore, Leurer and Barrington-Foote JJ.A. Docket: CACV3908 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: Timothy Turple for the Appellant Jason Brunton for the Respondent The Court I. INTRODUCTIO......
-
J.N. v C.G.,
...treatment by Health Canada, the national body tasked with determining that treatment's safety and effectiveness. In O.M.S v. E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, at para. 48, writes that: [I]n a family dispute, it is both unnecessary and, in most cases, unhelpful, for......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...with these reasons, we have explained why the mother's appeal against the Vaccination Decision must be allowed: O.M.S. v E.J.S., 2023 SKCA 8 [ CA Vaccination Decision]. These reasons explain why the mother's appeal against the Evidentiary Fiat and the Publication Ban Fiat must be ......