A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Leurer, Tholl and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 114 |
| Docket Number | CACV3438 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 06 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
T.C. v A.E.,
...interim parenting order. The nature of such a change has recently been described by Kalmakoff J.A. in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114: [133] As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Gordon [[1996] 2 SCR 27], change alone is not enough to satisfy the applicant’s burd......
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...is not unyielding, however, and there are exceptions to its rigid application, as outlined in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114: [183] … Whether to hear a new issue being raised for the first time on appeal is a matter of discretion. The discretion is “narrow a......
-
Yashcheshen v Saskatchewan (Ministry of Health),
...one. [66] As stated by Kalmakoff J.A., in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114 at para 183, the discretion to hear a new issue raised for the first time on appeal is narrow and is to be exercised sparingly. [67]&#......
-
T.S. v. J.B.,
...on the impact of the change on a child’s best interests. See also T.C. v A.E., 2021 SKCA 79; A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114; Thieven v Thieven, 2019 SKCA 128, 30 RFL (8th) 257; Talbot v Henry (1990), 25 RFL (3d) 415 (Sask CA); and Greyeyes v Greyeyes, 2021 SKQB 14 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
T.C. v A.E.,
...interim parenting order. The nature of such a change has recently been described by Kalmakoff J.A. in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114: [133] As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Gordon [[1996] 2 SCR 27], change alone is not enough to satisfy the applicant’s burd......
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...is not unyielding, however, and there are exceptions to its rigid application, as outlined in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114: [183] … Whether to hear a new issue being raised for the first time on appeal is a matter of discretion. The discretion is “narrow a......
-
Yashcheshen v Saskatchewan (Ministry of Health),
...one. [66] As stated by Kalmakoff J.A., in A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114 at para 183, the discretion to hear a new issue raised for the first time on appeal is narrow and is to be exercised sparingly. [67]&#......
-
T.S. v. J.B.,
...on the impact of the change on a child’s best interests. See also T.C. v A.E., 2021 SKCA 79; A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114; Thieven v Thieven, 2019 SKCA 128, 30 RFL (8th) 257; Talbot v Henry (1990), 25 RFL (3d) 415 (Sask CA); and Greyeyes v Greyeyes, 2021 SKQB 14 ......
Request a trial to view additional results