A.M. v. S.D., 2020 ONCJ 479
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | JUSTICE S.B. SHERR |
| Citation | 2020 ONCJ 479 |
| Docket Number | D31309/19 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 26 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Seyyad v. Pathan,
...best interests where he chooses not to see the child for many months rather than go to supervised access. See: A.M. v. S.D., 2020 ONCJ 479. Communication [86] The parties agreed to use Appclose to communicate with each other about the child. ......
-
A.M. v. S.D.,
...four-year-old child (the child), and the respondent’s request for a restraining order against the applicant. See: A.M. v. S.D., 2020 ONCJ 479. [2] The court granted the respondent custody of the child and the incidents of custody sough......
2 cases
-
Seyyad v. Pathan,
...best interests where he chooses not to see the child for many months rather than go to supervised access. See: A.M. v. S.D., 2020 ONCJ 479. Communication [86] The parties agreed to use Appclose to communicate with each other about the child. ......
-
A.M. v. S.D.,
...four-year-old child (the child), and the respondent’s request for a restraining order against the applicant. See: A.M. v. S.D., 2020 ONCJ 479. [2] The court granted the respondent custody of the child and the incidents of custody sough......