MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 246 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0336-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 22 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 practice notes
-
Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
..., citing Professor Rollie Thompson, “Case Comment: Contino v Leonelli-Contino” (2004), 42 RFL (5th) 326 ; see also MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246. As to the application of section 9 of the Guidelines in light of section 4 of the Guidelines where the obligor’s annual income exceeds $150......
-
Table of Cases
...12...........................................................................................................136 MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246...................................................................................189, 335, 337, 338, 341 MacDonald v Frampton (1987), 78 NSR (......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...Alberta Court of Appeal should re-examine the criteria set out in the majority judgment in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt, see MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246; Peters v Atchooay, 2021 ABCA 469 Keating v Keating, 2017 ABCA 428 at para 8; see also ZAM v AVT, 2018 ABQB 319. 470 See Phipps v Phipps, [20......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...the family home and its impact on the determination of child support, see MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132. 209 MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246 at para 46; Ramachala (Holland) v Holland, 2020 ABQB 210 Stewart v Stewart, 2007 MBCA 66. 435 436 Canadian family law In Contino v Leonelli-......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
Wolfson v Wolfson,
...supra; Woodford v MacDonald, 2014 NSCA 31; Boudreau v Marchand, 2012 NSCA 79; Dillon v Dillon, 2005 NSCA 166; MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246; McCrate v McCrate, 2019 NSSC 167; and Lozinski v Lozinski, 2017 BCCA [426] Ms. Wolfson compared the children’s budget presente......
-
Peters v Atchooay,
...question of imputation of income should be addressed as part of the calculation of Table amounts under s 9(a): see MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246 [MacDonald]. The court will then go on to consider the factors under s 9(b) and (c) in determining Guidelines [62] &#x......
-
FDM v EGM,
...as more particularized in the seminal case of Contino v Leonelli-Contino, 2005 SCC 63. Our Court of Appeal in MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246 at paras 12-15 has helpfully provided a refresh on the Contino principles, emphasizing that the language of section 9 is imperative, with the Tabl......
-
Groch v Groch,
...as outlined by the Supreme Court of Canada in Contino, as further summarized by the Alberta Court of Appeal in MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246 at para 12 and Destine v Cloutier, 2022 ABCA 331 at para 29. As stated in MacDonald at para • &#x......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...12...........................................................................................................136 MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246...................................................................................189, 335, 337, 338, 341 MacDonald v Frampton (1987), 78 NSR (......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...Alberta Court of Appeal should re-examine the criteria set out in the majority judgment in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt, see MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246; Peters v Atchooay, 2021 ABCA 469 Keating v Keating, 2017 ABCA 428 at para 8; see also ZAM v AVT, 2018 ABQB 319. 470 See Phipps v Phipps, [20......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...the family home and its impact on the determination of child support, see MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132. 209 MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246 at para 46; Ramachala (Holland) v Holland, 2020 ABQB 210 Stewart v Stewart, 2007 MBCA 66. 435 436 Canadian family law In Contino v Leonelli-......
-
Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
..., citing Professor Rollie Thompson, “Case Comment: Contino v Leonelli-Contino” (2004), 42 RFL (5th) 326 ; see also MacDonald v Brodoff, 2020 ABCA 246. As to the application of section 9 of the Guidelines in light of section 4 of the Guidelines where the obligor’s annual income exceeds $150......