Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMaster R.W. McDiarmid
Citation2018 BCSC 1284
Date31 July 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number5692
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • McCarthy Estate (Re),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 9, 2021
    ...the complete absence of witnesses can be overlooked: Kuszak v Smoley (1986), 46 Man R (2d) 14 at para. 6, 23 ETR 237; Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at paras. 55-6, 39 ETR (4th) 70; Litke Estate (Re), 2017 BCSC 1079 at paras. 5, 43, 31 ETR (4th) 276; Schreiber Estate (Re), 2015 SKQB 96 at......
  • Cook Estate (Re), 2019 BCSC 417
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 11, 2019
    ...the document connotes a sense of finality, or is precatory in nature. See also Lane Estate, 2015 BCSC 2162 at para. 44; Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. [71]       I am also required to consider the following legal framework on this application. [72]&#......
  • 2023 BCSC 843,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...document or record does not expressly revoke a prior will, it may be given effect as a codicil to the will: Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. Evidence and Analysis 44 There are a number of factors that British Columbia courts have considered when determining whether a document repre......
  • Jakonen Estate (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...document or record does not expressly revoke a prior will, it may be given effect as a codicil to the will: Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. Evidence and Analysis Is the Order to Pay an authentic document? [47]       In respect of the first threshold i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • McCarthy Estate (Re), 2021 ABCA 403
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 9, 2021
    ...the complete absence of witnesses can be overlooked: Kuszak v Smoley (1986), 46 Man R (2d) 14 at para. 6, 23 ETR 237; Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at paras. 55-6, 39 ETR (4th) 70; Litke Estate (Re), 2017 BCSC 1079 at paras. 5, 43, 31 ETR (4th) 276; Schreiber Estate (Re), 2015 SKQB 96 at......
  • Cook Estate (Re), 2019 BCSC 417
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 11, 2019
    ...the document connotes a sense of finality, or is precatory in nature. See also Lane Estate, 2015 BCSC 2162 at para. 44; Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. [71]       I am also required to consider the following legal framework on this application. [72]&#......
  • Jakonen Estate (Re), 2022 BCSC 2261
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...document or record does not expressly revoke a prior will, it may be given effect as a codicil to the will: Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. Evidence and Analysis Is the Order to Pay an authentic document? [47]       In respect of the first threshold i......
  • Henderson v. Myler, 2021 BCSC 1649
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 20, 2021
    ...the language in the document is precatory or connotes a sense of finality: Lane Estate, 2015 BCSC 2162 at para. 44; Mace Estate (Re), 2018 BCSC 1284 at para. [283] The factors supporting that the Note represents Ms. Murray’s final intentions are: 1. it was left in Ms. Murray’s lockbox with ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT