MacInnis v Bayer Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Barrington-Foote,Caldwell,Tholl |
| Citation | 2023 SKCA 37 |
| Date | 20 March 2023 |
| Docket Number | CACV3740 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
40 practice notes
-
Stromberg v Olafson
...standards apply to appeals relating to questions of fact, law, and mixed fact and law. This was discussed in MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis], in the context of an appeal of a decision as to whether certification criteria had met: [38] A decision by a certification judge as to......
-
Saskatoon Minor Basketball Association v. MacDonald
...440, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 32715. See: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235; MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 at para 38–39; Kot v Kot, 2021 SKCA 4 at para 20, 63 ETR (4th) 161; and Stromberg v Olafson, 2023 SKCA 67 at paras 117–124 [18] In terms of co......
-
Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan
...of a discretionary decision that began with Strom, and continued in Kot v Kot, 2021 SKCA 4, 63 ETR (4th) 161 [Kot], MacInnis v Bayer, 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis] and Stromberg v Olafson, 2023 SKCA 67 [23] Prior to Strom, the formulation of the discretionary standard that had generally been appl......
-
Hoedel v WestJet Airlines Ltd.
...of review depends on the nature of the error alleged, not the label attached to the decision being reviewed. MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis], is instructive on this point: [38] … Although it is often said that discretionary decisions are entitled to deference, the fact is tha......
Get Started for Free
40 cases
-
Stromberg v Olafson
...standards apply to appeals relating to questions of fact, law, and mixed fact and law. This was discussed in MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis], in the context of an appeal of a decision as to whether certification criteria had met: [38] A decision by a certification judge as to......
-
Saskatoon Minor Basketball Association v. MacDonald
...440, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2008 CanLII 32715. See: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235; MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 at para 38–39; Kot v Kot, 2021 SKCA 4 at para 20, 63 ETR (4th) 161; and Stromberg v Olafson, 2023 SKCA 67 at paras 117–124 [18] In terms of co......
-
Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan
...of a discretionary decision that began with Strom, and continued in Kot v Kot, 2021 SKCA 4, 63 ETR (4th) 161 [Kot], MacInnis v Bayer, 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis] and Stromberg v Olafson, 2023 SKCA 67 [23] Prior to Strom, the formulation of the discretionary standard that had generally been appl......
-
Hoedel v WestJet Airlines Ltd.
...of review depends on the nature of the error alleged, not the label attached to the decision being reviewed. MacInnis v Bayer Inc., 2023 SKCA 37 [MacInnis], is instructive on this point: [38] … Although it is often said that discretionary decisions are entitled to deference, the fact is tha......
Get Started for Free
