MacLennan v MacLennan,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeLeurer, Barrington-Foote and Kalmakoff JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 132
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACV3706
Date07 October 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Gaunce v Gaunce,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Febrero 2023
    ...support and any hardship the retroactive award may occasion on the payor spouse” (at para 207; see also MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 at para 98; Jones v Jones, 2017 SKCA 46 at para 91, 95 RFL (7th) 43; and M. v M. 2012 SKCA 55 at para 23, 46 RFL (7th) 24). None of these consi......
  • Ghremida v Elgahwas,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Febrero 2023
    ...his position in this appeal. As I will explain, each is easily distinguishable. 49 First, Dr. Ghremida refers to MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 [ MacLennan]. In that case, this Court varied an interim support order against a high-income parent involving adult children. Justice Kalmako......
  • Wilk v Martin-Wilk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 25 Mayo 2023
    ...same standard of review applies to decisions regarding interim support orders, including determinations of income: MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 at paras 11–13 [ MacLennan], and Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518 at para 23 Findings of fact by a Chambers judge based on affidavi......
3 cases
  • Gaunce v Gaunce,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Febrero 2023
    ...support and any hardship the retroactive award may occasion on the payor spouse” (at para 207; see also MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 at para 98; Jones v Jones, 2017 SKCA 46 at para 91, 95 RFL (7th) 43; and M. v M. 2012 SKCA 55 at para 23, 46 RFL (7th) 24). None of these consi......
  • Ghremida v Elgahwas,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Febrero 2023
    ...his position in this appeal. As I will explain, each is easily distinguishable. 49 First, Dr. Ghremida refers to MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 [ MacLennan]. In that case, this Court varied an interim support order against a high-income parent involving adult children. Justice Kalmako......
  • Wilk v Martin-Wilk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 25 Mayo 2023
    ...same standard of review applies to decisions regarding interim support orders, including determinations of income: MacLennan v MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132 at paras 11–13 [ MacLennan], and Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518 at para 23 Findings of fact by a Chambers judge based on affidavi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT