Madrigal v. Castro, 2015 ABQB 312
Judge | Read, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | May 14, 2015 |
Citations | 2015 ABQB 312;(2015), 617 A.R. 192 (QB) |
Madrigal v. Castro (2015), 617 A.R. 192 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2015] A.R. TBEd. MY.101
Francisco Roel Salinas Madrigal (applicant) v. Evelyn Tamaz Castro (respondent)
(FL03 42323; 4803 170253; 2015 ABQB 312)
Indexed As: Madrigal v. Castro
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Edmonton
Read, J.
May 15, 2015.
Summary:
The father applied under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, seeking the return of the parties' two children, ages five and 3.5. The father alleged that in January 2014, the children were wrongly taken from Mexico to Alberta by the mother. The issue was whether the children were habitually resident in Mexico at the time they were taken to Alberta.
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench denied the application. While the removal was "in breach of rights of custody" of the father, the habitual residence of the children in January 2014 was Edmonton, Alberta. The objective evidence established that there was no joint settled intention to make Mexico their habitual residence.
Family Law - Topic 1961.1
Custody and access - Child abduction legislation - Habitual residence - See paragraphs 27 to 50.
Family Law - Topic 1962
Custody and access - Child abduction legislation - Jurisdiction - See paragraphs 10 to 13.
Counsel:
Francisco Roel Salinas Madrigal, on his own behalf;
Goli Yohannes (Family Law Office), for the respondent.
This application was heard on May 14, 2015, before Read, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Edmonton, who delivered the following judgment and reasons, dated May 15, 2015.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
MLJ v SFJL, 2017 ABQB 194
...86, aff’d 2013 ABCA 133, 544 AR 246, 84 Alta LR (5th) 62 Csoke v Fustos, 2013 ONSC 2417 Nafie v Badawy, 2014 ABQB 262 Madrigal v Castro, 2015 ABQB 312, 617 AR 192 Wirta v Wirta, 2016 ONSC 3835 [Wirta] The principles that arise from these cases are as follows: “habitual residence” is the cen......
-
MLJ v SFJL, 2017 ABQB 194
...86, aff’d 2013 ABCA 133, 544 AR 246, 84 Alta LR (5th) 62 Csoke v Fustos, 2013 ONSC 2417 Nafie v Badawy, 2014 ABQB 262 Madrigal v Castro, 2015 ABQB 312, 617 AR 192 Wirta v Wirta, 2016 ONSC 3835 [Wirta] The principles that arise from these cases are as follows: “habitual residence” is the cen......