Magnum Mortgage & Realty Corp. v. Cruickshank, [2011] A.R. Uned. 777
| Subject Matter | CHATTEL MORTGAGES AND BILLS OF SALE,MORTGAGES,GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY |
| Citation | [2011] A.R. Uned. 777,[2011] A.R. Uned. 777 (QBM),2011 ABQB 744 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 29 November 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Bentley v Hooton, 2019 ABQB 822
...not a disguised action on the covenant to pay in a mortgage. It is distinguishable from Magnum Mortgage & Realty Corp v Cruickshank, 2011 ABQB 744, insofar as that case dealt with the lender’s attempt to get judgment by enforcing a covenant in a General Security Agreement that was co-ex......
1 cases
-
Bentley v Hooton, 2019 ABQB 822
...not a disguised action on the covenant to pay in a mortgage. It is distinguishable from Magnum Mortgage & Realty Corp v Cruickshank, 2011 ABQB 744, insofar as that case dealt with the lender’s attempt to get judgment by enforcing a covenant in a General Security Agreement that was co-ex......