MAHARAJ v. TOWN OF ROSETOWN, 2020 SKQB 254

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeMcCREARY J.
Citation2020 SKQB 254
Date05 October 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 1174 of 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • KAISER v. RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF BAILDON NO. 131,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 Enero 2023
    ...apply is that of reasonableness. In this regard, I refer to the comments of McCreary J. (as she then was) in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254, 94 Admin LR (6th) 127 [17]     Reasonableness is the standard of review to be applied by a reviewing court when a challe......
  • Maharaj v. Rosetown (Town),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 21 Julio 2022
    ...In Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 [Maharaj 2020], I ultimately determined that certain resolutions passed by the Town did not violate The Municipalities Act, nor thes="MsoNormal" style="tab-stops:-72.0pt -36.0pt 0cm 99.0pt 108.0pt 144.0pt 180.0pt 216.0pt 252.0pt 288.0pt ......
  • A Guide To Dealing With Municipal Code Of Ethics Complaints
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Mayo 2021
    ...make representations and have those representations heard, and the right to know the reasons for the decision: Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 55. The underlying notion is that council should make administrative decisions using a fair and open procedure, appropriate to the ......
  • Baran v. Rural Municipality of Dundurn No. 314,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 3 Agosto 2022
    ...the court is exercising its discretion: s. 358(5). This circumstance was confirmed by Justice McCreary in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 16   Finally, even if a bylaw or resolution violates The Municipalities Act or a municipality's bylaws, the court's ......
3 cases
  • KAISER v. RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF BAILDON NO. 131,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 Enero 2023
    ...apply is that of reasonableness. In this regard, I refer to the comments of McCreary J. (as she then was) in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254, 94 Admin LR (6th) 127 [17]     Reasonableness is the standard of review to be applied by a reviewing court when a challe......
  • Maharaj v. Rosetown (Town),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 21 Julio 2022
    ...In Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 [Maharaj 2020], I ultimately determined that certain resolutions passed by the Town did not violate The Municipalities Act, nor thes="MsoNormal" style="tab-stops:-72.0pt -36.0pt 0cm 99.0pt 108.0pt 144.0pt 180.0pt 216.0pt 252.0pt 288.0pt ......
  • Baran v. Rural Municipality of Dundurn No. 314,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 3 Agosto 2022
    ...the court is exercising its discretion: s. 358(5). This circumstance was confirmed by Justice McCreary in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 16   Finally, even if a bylaw or resolution violates The Municipalities Act or a municipality's bylaws, the court's ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • A Guide To Dealing With Municipal Code Of Ethics Complaints
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Mayo 2021
    ...make representations and have those representations heard, and the right to know the reasons for the decision: Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 55. The underlying notion is that council should make administrative decisions using a fair and open procedure, appropriate to the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT