MAHARAJ v. TOWN OF ROSETOWN, 2020 SKQB 254
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | McCREARY J. |
Citation | 2020 SKQB 254 |
Date | 05 October 2020 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Docket Number | QBG 1174 of 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
KAISER v. RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF BAILDON NO. 131,
...apply is that of reasonableness. In this regard, I refer to the comments of McCreary J. (as she then was) in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254, 94 Admin LR (6th) 127 [17] Reasonableness is the standard of review to be applied by a reviewing court when a challe......
-
Maharaj v. Rosetown (Town),
...In Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 [Maharaj 2020], I ultimately determined that certain resolutions passed by the Town did not violate The Municipalities Act, nor thes="MsoNormal" style="tab-stops:-72.0pt -36.0pt 0cm 99.0pt 108.0pt 144.0pt 180.0pt 216.0pt 252.0pt 288.0pt ......
-
A Guide To Dealing With Municipal Code Of Ethics Complaints
...make representations and have those representations heard, and the right to know the reasons for the decision: Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 55. The underlying notion is that council should make administrative decisions using a fair and open procedure, appropriate to the ......
-
Baran v. Rural Municipality of Dundurn No. 314,
...the court is exercising its discretion: s. 358(5). This circumstance was confirmed by Justice McCreary in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 16 Finally, even if a bylaw or resolution violates The Municipalities Act or a municipality's bylaws, the court's ......
3 cases
-
KAISER v. RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF BAILDON NO. 131,
...apply is that of reasonableness. In this regard, I refer to the comments of McCreary J. (as she then was) in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254, 94 Admin LR (6th) 127 [17] Reasonableness is the standard of review to be applied by a reviewing court when a challe......
-
Maharaj v. Rosetown (Town),
...In Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 [Maharaj 2020], I ultimately determined that certain resolutions passed by the Town did not violate The Municipalities Act, nor thes="MsoNormal" style="tab-stops:-72.0pt -36.0pt 0cm 99.0pt 108.0pt 144.0pt 180.0pt 216.0pt 252.0pt 288.0pt ......
-
Baran v. Rural Municipality of Dundurn No. 314,
...the court is exercising its discretion: s. 358(5). This circumstance was confirmed by Justice McCreary in Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 16 Finally, even if a bylaw or resolution violates The Municipalities Act or a municipality's bylaws, the court's ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
A Guide To Dealing With Municipal Code Of Ethics Complaints
...make representations and have those representations heard, and the right to know the reasons for the decision: Maharaj v Rosetown (Town), 2020 SKQB 254 at para 55. The underlying notion is that council should make administrative decisions using a fair and open procedure, appropriate to the ......