MALANOWICH v. TOTH, 2021 SKQB 249

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeBROWN J.
Neutral Citation2021 SKQB 249
Citation2021 SKQB 249
Docket NumberFLD 80 of 2013
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date27 September 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Friesen v Friesen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Mayo 2023
    ...corresponding amendments to the CLA 2020: see, for example, Van Os v Van Os, 2022 SKQB 161; R.H. v R.S., 2022 SKQB 52; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249; K.F.L. v B.K., 2021 SKQB 229; Riel v Riel, 2016 SKQB 174, rev'd in part 2017 SKCA 74, 99 RFL (7th) 367; Anderson v Anderson, 2013 SKQ......
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2023
    ...for the purposes of section 16.93(1): Legislating About Relocating at page 10; MJV v JR, 2022 BCSC 1068 at para 33; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249 at paras 43-47. However, in my view, this is difficult to reconcile with the fact that the Divorce Act treats “arrangements” and......
  • Shipton v. Shipton,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Marzo 2023
    ...T.L.L., 2021 ABQB 680 (CanLII), at paras. 15-20, esp. para. 16; Cote v. Parsons, 2021 ONSC 3719 (CanLII), at para. 51; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249 (CanLII), at paras. 21-48.  Once one sees the verbal architecture, it is impossible to unsee it.  The court can now refer to the ......
3 cases
  • Friesen v Friesen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Mayo 2023
    ...corresponding amendments to the CLA 2020: see, for example, Van Os v Van Os, 2022 SKQB 161; R.H. v R.S., 2022 SKQB 52; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249; K.F.L. v B.K., 2021 SKQB 229; Riel v Riel, 2016 SKQB 174, rev'd in part 2017 SKCA 74, 99 RFL (7th) 367; Anderson v Anderson, 2013 SKQ......
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2023
    ...for the purposes of section 16.93(1): Legislating About Relocating at page 10; MJV v JR, 2022 BCSC 1068 at para 33; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249 at paras 43-47. However, in my view, this is difficult to reconcile with the fact that the Divorce Act treats “arrangements” and......
  • Shipton v. Shipton,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 Marzo 2023
    ...T.L.L., 2021 ABQB 680 (CanLII), at paras. 15-20, esp. para. 16; Cote v. Parsons, 2021 ONSC 3719 (CanLII), at para. 51; Malanowich v Toth, 2021 SKQB 249 (CanLII), at paras. 21-48.  Once one sees the verbal architecture, it is impossible to unsee it.  The court can now refer to the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT